Nannini L J
Hospital Escuela de Granadero Baigorria, Rosario.
Medicina (B Aires). 1995;55(6):647-51.
Accuracy of death certification and registration have been investigated in many countries because death certificates constitute the unavoidable source for studying asthma mortality. The purposes of this study were: 1) to assess the reliability of official registration of asthma death certification and 2) to describe the percentage of asthma deaths occurring outside-hospital in Rosario during 1988. All death certificates from Rosario residents over 5 years old, in which appeared the word asthma or derivatives, were studied. The asthma mortality rates from 1981 to 1989 were obtained from the "Official annual publication". The diagnosis of asthma was written somewhere on 45 certificates; but 30 certificates were interpreted as asthma being the most appropriate diagnosis and could then be coded as the cause of death. These 30 asthma related deaths occurred at the mean age of 59.23 yrs +/- 17.23 (SD), range 12-84 yrs. Twenty-two deaths out of the total of 30 occurred in an out-hospital setting (73%). Among the 30 cases, 8 subjects (aged 63.0 yr +/- 12.38) died in hospital. There was no difference between the age, sex and the death place. Autopsy was performed in only one case of 12 years old. In other 3 cases, asthma was confirmed as the cause of death through the evaluation of case records and the confidential information collected from close acquaintances. The mean asthma mortality rate from 1981 to 88 in Rosario was 5.69 +/- 1.06/10(5), and this value was significantly higher than the death rate calculated by this study (3.46/10(5); p = 0.0005, T test for one sample). The difference probably originated in the false positive certificates often related to procedures in the General Registrar Office. In other words, there was an official overestimation of asthma deaths. This was the first description of the high percentage (73%) of asthma related deaths occurring in the out-hospital setting. Finally, even when death certificates should require a further and exhaustive assessment, asthma mortality rates in Rosario might be regarded as of great concern.
许多国家都对死亡证明和登记的准确性进行了调查,因为死亡证明是研究哮喘死亡率不可避免的信息来源。本研究的目的是:1)评估哮喘死亡证明官方登记的可靠性;2)描述1988年罗萨里奥市院外哮喘死亡的百分比。对罗萨里奥市所有5岁以上居民的死亡证明进行了研究,这些证明中出现了哮喘或其衍生词。1981年至1989年的哮喘死亡率来自“官方年度出版物”。45份证明上某处写有哮喘诊断;但30份证明被解释为哮喘是最合适的诊断,因此可被编码为死亡原因。这30例与哮喘相关的死亡发生时的平均年龄为59.23岁±17.23(标准差),年龄范围为12至84岁。30例死亡中有22例发生在院外(73%)。在这30例病例中,8名受试者(年龄63.0岁±12.38)在医院死亡。年龄、性别和死亡地点之间没有差异。仅对1例12岁的病例进行了尸检。在其他3例病例中,通过评估病例记录和从亲密熟人处收集的机密信息,确认哮喘为死亡原因。1981年至1988年罗萨里奥市的平均哮喘死亡率为5.69±1.06/10万,该值显著高于本研究计算的死亡率(3.46/10万;p = 0.0005,单样本t检验)。差异可能源于通常与总登记官办公室程序相关的假阳性证明。换句话说,官方高估了哮喘死亡人数。这是首次描述院外发生的哮喘相关死亡的高百分比(73%)。最后,即使死亡证明需要进一步详尽评估,罗萨里奥市的哮喘死亡率仍可能令人高度担忧。