• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级卫生保健团队研讨会:团队成员的观点

Primary health care team workshop: team members' perspectives.

作者信息

Long S

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, England.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1996 May;23(5):935-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.10911.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.10911.x
PMID:8732520
Abstract

This study explored members' perceptions of teamwork in two primary health care teams (PHCTs). It also examined the effect of a team-building intervention on members' perceptions centred around five topics: the PHCT, role perception, communication, leadership and conflict. The study used a qualitative approach with semistructured interviews before and after the intervention. It was found that members perceived each other's roles only in the light of their interactions with each other. Issues of hierarchy in leadership and interpersonal conflicts were raised. It is concluded that the team-building intervention had some positive effects on team members' perceptions and behaviour. However, further research is needed into management structures and conflict resolution in the PHCT.

摘要

本研究探讨了两个初级卫生保健团队(PHCTs)成员对团队合作的看法。它还考察了团队建设干预措施对成员围绕五个主题的看法的影响,这五个主题是:初级卫生保健团队、角色认知、沟通、领导和冲突。该研究采用定性方法,在干预前后进行半结构化访谈。研究发现,成员们仅根据彼此之间的互动来感知对方的角色。研究还提出了领导层级和人际冲突的问题。研究得出结论,团队建设干预措施对团队成员的看法和行为产生了一些积极影响。然而,需要对初级卫生保健团队的管理结构和冲突解决进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Primary health care team workshop: team members' perspectives.初级卫生保健团队研讨会:团队成员的观点
J Adv Nurs. 1996 May;23(5):935-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.10911.x.
2
What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.
3
Conflict on interprofessional primary health care teams--can it be resolved?跨专业基层医疗团队的冲突——能解决吗?
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):4-10. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.497750. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
4
There is no "i" in teamwork in the patient-centered medical home: defining teamwork competencies for academic practice.在以患者为中心的医疗之家,团队合作中没有“我”:为学术实践定义团队合作能力。
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):585-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b0289.
5
Interprofessional collaboration in family health teams: An Ontario-based study.家庭健康团队中的跨专业合作:基于安大略省的研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Oct;56(10):e368-74.
6
Improving Care Teams' Functioning: Recommendations from Team Science.改善护理团队的运作:团队科学的建议。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Jul;43(7):361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors.创伤团队与人为因素相关的文化。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01566.x.
8
Acute care nursing team members' perceptions of roles: Their own and each other's.急性护理护理团队成员对角色的看法:他们自己的和彼此的。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Nov;27(8):1784-1790. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12877. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
Patients' and health professionals' perceptions of teamwork in primary care.患者与医疗专业人员对初级保健中团队合作的看法。
J Prim Health Care. 2011 Jun 1;3(2):128-35.
10
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Funding models and medical dominance in interdisciplinary primary care teams: qualitative evidence from three Canadian provinces.多学科初级保健团队中的资金模式和医疗主导地位:来自加拿大三个省份的定性证据。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Aug 13;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0299-3.
2
Funding and remuneration of interdisciplinary primary care teams in Canada: a conceptual framework and application.加拿大跨学科初级保健团队的资金与薪酬:一个概念框架及应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 15;17(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2290-4.
3
Do primary care professionals agree about progress with implementation of primary care teams: results from a cross sectional study.
基层医疗专业人员对基层医疗团队的实施进展是否达成共识:一项横断面研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 22;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0541-9.
4
Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework.基层姑息治疗中的跨专业关系与沟通:黄金标准框架的影响
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Apr;58(549):256-63. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X279760.
5
Work in progress. Integrating physicians' services in the home.进行中。整合家庭医生服务。
Can Fam Physician. 2001 Dec;47:2502-9.
6
The future general practitioner: out of date and running out of time.未来的全科医生:过时且时间紧迫。
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):743-6.