• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。

What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x
PMID:22891905
Abstract

CONTEXT

The effect of teamwork on team performance is broadly recognised in the medical field. This recognition is manifested in educational programmes in which attention to interpersonal behaviours during teamwork is growing. Conflict and power differences influence interpersonal behaviours and are marked topics in studies of group functioning in the social and organisational psychology literature. Insights from the domain of social sciences put the ongoing improvement of teamwork into broader perspective.

OBJECTIVES

This paper shows how knowledge from the domain of social and organisational psychology contributes to the understanding of teamwork in the medical environment. More specifically, this paper suggests that unfolding the underlying issues of power and conflict within medical teams can be of extra help in the development of educational interventions aimed at improving team performance.

METHODS

We review the key social psychology and organisational behaviour literature concerning power and conflict, and relate the insights derived from this to the team process of ad hoc medical action teams.

RESULTS

We present a theoretical framework in which insights into power and conflict are used to explain and predict team dynamics in ad hoc medical action teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Power and conflict strongly influence interpersonal behaviour. Characteristics of medical action teams give rise to all kinds of issues of disagreement and are accompanied by complex issues of intra-team power distribution. We argue that how team members coordinate, cooperate and communicate is steered by members' personal motivations, which, in turn, strongly depend on their perceptions of power and conflict. Given the importance of the performance of these teams, we suggest future directions for the development of training interventions building on knowledge and theories derived from social and organisational psychology.

摘要

背景

团队合作对团队绩效的影响在医学领域得到广泛认可。这种认可体现在教育项目中,越来越关注团队合作期间的人际行为。冲突和权力差异会影响人际行为,并且是社会心理学和组织心理学文献中群体功能研究的显著主题。来自社会科学领域的观点将团队合作的不断改进置于更广阔的视角。

目的

本文展示了社会和组织心理学领域的知识如何有助于理解医学环境中的团队合作。更具体地说,本文认为,揭示医疗团队内部的权力和冲突问题,可以帮助我们更好地制定旨在提高团队绩效的教育干预措施。

方法

我们回顾了有关权力和冲突的关键社会心理学和组织行为文献,并将从中得出的见解与临时医疗行动团队的团队流程联系起来。

结果

我们提出了一个理论框架,其中权力和冲突的见解用于解释和预测临时医疗行动团队的团队动态。

结论

权力和冲突强烈影响人际行为。医疗行动团队的特点引发了各种意见不合的问题,并伴随着复杂的团队内部权力分配问题。我们认为,团队成员的协调、合作和沟通方式受到成员个人动机的影响,而这些动机又强烈取决于他们对权力和冲突的看法。鉴于这些团队的表现至关重要,我们建议未来根据社会和组织心理学的知识和理论发展培训干预措施。

相似文献

1
What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.
2
Conflict in medical teams: opportunity or danger?医疗团队中的冲突:机会还是危险?
Med Educ. 2012 Oct;46(10):935-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04321.x.
3
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.评估手术团队的表现。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.
4
Power and conflict and the performance of medical action teams: a commentary.权力、冲突与医疗行动团队的表现:一篇评论
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):833-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04330.x.
5
There is no "i" in teamwork in the patient-centered medical home: defining teamwork competencies for academic practice.在以患者为中心的医疗之家,团队合作中没有“我”:为学术实践定义团队合作能力。
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):585-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b0289.
6
The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors.创伤团队与人为因素相关的文化。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01566.x.
7
Primary health care team workshop: team members' perspectives.初级卫生保健团队研讨会:团队成员的观点
J Adv Nurs. 1996 May;23(5):935-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.10911.x.
8
The ABC of health care team dynamics: understanding complex affective, behavioral, and cognitive dynamics in interprofessional teams.医疗团队动态的 ABC:理解跨专业团队中复杂的情感、行为和认知动态。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Jan-Mar;39(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182766504.
9
Illusions of team working in health care.医疗保健中的团队合作幻象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(1):134-42. doi: 10.1108/14777261311311843.
10
Bringing Specialties Together: The Power of Intra-Professional Teams.整合专业力量:跨专业团队的力量。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):19-20. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00509.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Team behaviour in interprofessional collaboration during trauma alerts: A critical incident study from the perspective of radiographers.创伤警报期间跨专业协作中的团队行为:放射技师视角的关键事件研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Mar;39(1):e13308. doi: 10.1111/scs.13308. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training.改变对话方式:旨在优化基于模拟的团队培训跨专业促进作用的指南的影响
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Oct 12;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00313-3.
3
A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs.
基于跨专业模拟的团队培训项目的范围综述
Simul Healthc. 2025 Feb 1;20(1):33-41. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
4
How to enrich team research in healthcare by considering five theoretical perspectives.如何通过考虑五个理论视角来丰富医疗保健领域的团队研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1232331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232331. eCollection 2023.
5
Development and validity evidence for the intraprofessional conflict exercise: An assessment tool to support collaboration.跨专业冲突演练的开发与有效性证据:一种支持协作的评估工具。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 17;18(2):e0280564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280564. eCollection 2023.
6
Analysis of the factors influencing teamwork among oncology nurses based on multigroup structural equation model.基于多组结构方程模型的肿瘤护理团队协作影响因素分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1015. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4217.
7
"Maybe I'm not that approachable": using simulation to elicit team leaders' perceptions of their role in facilitating speaking up behaviors.“也许我没那么平易近人”:运用模拟方法来引出团队领导者对自身在促进直言行为中所扮演角色的看法。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Sep 24;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00227-y.
8
Attitudes of primary care providers on early palliative care, in new community settings of Attica, Greece; a qualitative analysis.希腊阿提卡新社区环境中基层医疗服务提供者对早期姑息治疗的态度;一项定性分析
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jun;11(6):2327-2333. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2559_20. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Interpersonal Conflict between Clinicians in the Delivery of Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.危重症患者姑息治疗和临终关怀中临床医生之间的人际冲突:二次定性分析。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;25(10):1501-1509. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0631. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
10
[Professional teamwork and communication in the operating room-A narrative review].[手术室中的专业团队合作与沟通——一项叙述性综述]
Anaesthesist. 2022 Feb;71(2):141-147. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01027-1. Epub 2021 Aug 27.