• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响社区安置成功的因素:TAPS项目26

Factors affecting the success of community placement: the TAPS project 26.

作者信息

Gooch C, Leff J

机构信息

TAPS Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):511-20. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035595.

DOI:10.1017/s0033291700035595
PMID:8733210
Abstract

Long-stay patients who were discharged from Friern and Claybury hospitals during the 6-year period between September 1985 and August 1991 were followed up for at least 1 year and the details of all readmissions were recorded. Of the 615 hospital leavers, some 178 (29%) were readmitted at some time during the follow-up period. A proportional hazards regression analysis revealed a number of independent baseline factors which affect the risk of readmission at any time during the follow-up period. Younger patients were more at risk of readmission than were older patients and 'new' long-stay patients had a greater risk than baseline patients. Risk was also greater in patients who had a larger number of pre-discharge admissions, a higher abnormal behaviour score (PSE BSO) or a diagnosis of manic psychosis. An ordinal logistic regression analysis revealed that these same five factors tended to increase the actual number of readmission episodes. The proportion of post-discharge time spent in hospital among the readmitted patients was found to be greater for males, new long-stay patients and for patients with a higher number of positive social behaviour symptoms (SBSPOS score).

摘要

对1985年9月至1991年8月这6年期间从弗里恩医院和克莱伯里医院出院的长期住院患者进行了至少1年的随访,并记录了所有再次入院的详细情况。在615名出院患者中,约178人(29%)在随访期间的某个时间再次入院。比例风险回归分析揭示了一些独立的基线因素,这些因素会影响随访期间任何时间再次入院的风险。年轻患者比老年患者更易再次入院,“新”长期住院患者比基线患者风险更高。出院前入院次数较多、异常行为评分(PSE BSO)较高或诊断为躁狂精神病的患者风险也更大。有序逻辑回归分析表明,这五个相同因素往往会增加再次入院发作的实际次数。研究发现,男性、新长期住院患者以及具有较多积极社会行为症状(SBSPOS评分)的患者再次入院后在医院度过的出院后时间比例更高。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting the success of community placement: the TAPS project 26.影响社区安置成功的因素:TAPS项目26
Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):511-20. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035595.
2
The TAPS project. 17: Readmission to hospital for long term psychiatric patients after discharge to the community.TAPS项目。17:长期精神病患者出院回归社区后的再次入院情况。
BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):996-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6860.996.
3
The TAPS Project. 22: A five-year follow-up of long-stay psychiatric patients discharged to the community.TAPS项目。22:对出院回归社区的长期住院精神科患者的五年随访。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1994 Nov(25):13-7.
4
Downsizing psychiatric hospitals: needs for care and services of current and discharged long-stay inpatients.精神病医院规模缩减:当前及已出院长期住院患者的护理与服务需求
Can J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;45(6):526-32. doi: 10.1177/070674370004500602.
5
The TAPS Project. 10: The long-stay populations of Friern and Claybury hospitals. The baseline survey.塔普斯项目。10:弗里恩医院和克莱伯里医院的长期住院患者群体。基线调查。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):30-5.
6
The TAPS Project. 12: Crime, vagrancy, death and readmission of the long-term mentally ill during their first year of local reprovision.TAPS项目。12:长期精神病患者在当地重新安置的第一年中的犯罪、流浪、死亡及再入院情况
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):40-4.
7
The TAPS Project. 13: Clinical and social outcomes of long-stay psychiatric patients after one year in the community.TAPS项目。13:长期住院精神科患者在社区生活一年后的临床和社会结局。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):45-56.
8
The TAPS project. 16: Difficult to place, long term psychiatric patients: risk factors for failure to resettle long stay patients in community facilities.TAPS项目。16:安置困难的长期精神病患者:长期住院患者难以在社区设施中重新安置的风险因素。
BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):993-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6860.993.
9
The TAPS Project 41: homes for life? Residential stability five years after hospital discharge. Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services.TAPS项目41:生活的归宿?出院五年后的居住稳定性。精神科服务评估团队。
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Aug;34(4):407-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1018792108559.
10
Deinstitutionalization for long-term mental illness: a 6-year evaluation.长期精神疾病的去机构化:一项为期6年的评估。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;36(1):60-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00984.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Placement challenges: implications for long-term care of dementia sufferers.安置挑战:对痴呆症患者长期护理的影响
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):285-8. doi: 10.1177/153331750101600504.
2
Outcome of long stay psychiatric patients resettled in the community: prospective cohort study.重新融入社区的长期住院精神科患者的结局:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 1999 Jul 3;319(7201):13-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.13.
3
The TAPS Project 41: homes for life? Residential stability five years after hospital discharge. Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services.
TAPS项目41:生活的归宿?出院五年后的居住稳定性。精神科服务评估团队。
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Aug;34(4):407-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1018792108559.