Dinnsen D A
Department of Linguistics, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA.
J Child Lang. 1996 Feb;23(1):57-79. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900010096.
Several competing proposals for the (under)specification of phonological representations are evaluated against the facts of phonemic acquisition. Longitudinal evidence relating to the emergence of a voice contrast in the well-documented study of Amahl (from age 2;2 to 3;11) is reconsidered. Neither contrastive specification nor context-free radical underspecification is capable of accounting for the facts. The problem is in the characterization of the change in the status of a feature from being noncontrastive and conditioned by context at one stage to being contrastive with phonetic effects that diffuse gradually through the lexicon. Both frameworks must treat as accidental the persistence of the early substitution pattern and require the postulation of wholesale changes in underlying representations, where these changes do not accord well with the observed phonetic changes or with the facts available to the learner. Context-sensitive radical underspecification provides a plausible account of each stage and the transition between stages with minimal grammar change.
针对音位习得的事实,对几种关于音系表征(未)具体说明的相互竞争的提议进行了评估。重新审视了在对阿玛尔(从2岁2个月到3岁11个月)的详细记录研究中与嗓音对比出现相关的纵向证据。对比性具体说明和无上下文的激进欠具体说明都无法解释这些事实。问题在于对一个特征状态变化的描述,即从在一个阶段是非对比性的且受上下文制约,到与逐渐扩散到词汇中的语音效应形成对比。这两种框架都必须将早期替代模式的持续视为偶然,并要求假定底层表征的全面变化,而这些变化与观察到的语音变化或学习者可获得的事实不太相符。上下文敏感的激进欠具体说明以最小的语法变化对每个阶段以及阶段之间的过渡提供了合理的解释。