• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Safety and cost-efficiency of 24-hour hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Musser D J, Calligaro K D, Dougherty M J, Raviola C A, DeLaurentis D A

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery/Pennsylvania Hospital, Thomas Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;10(2):143-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02000758.

DOI:10.1007/BF02000758
PMID:8733866
Abstract

The safety and cost savings of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were determined with guidelines developed after vascular "critical pathways" were implemented. Using these guidelines, our goal was to admit patients the day of surgery and to discharge them the next morning. Morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, same-day admissions, duration of stay, and hospital costs were compared between patients undergoing CEA who were electively admitted between September 1, 1992 and August 31, 1993 (group 1) and January 1, 1994 and March 31, 1995 (group 2). Between these two time periods, vascular critical pathways were instituted and all preoperative examinations were performed on an outpatient basis. The majority of CEAs were performed with the patient under general anesthesia. We found no significant differences between group 2 (n = 68) vs. group 1 (n = 40) in terms of mortality (1.5% [1 of 68] vs. 2.5% [1 of 40]), cardiac events (2.9% [2 of 68] vs. 2.5% [1 of 40]), neurologic events (2.9% [2 of 68] vs. 2.5% [1 of 40]), or readmission rate (1.5% [1 of 68] vs. 0% [0 of 40]). Same-day admissions were significantly higher (94% [64 of 68] vs. 5% [2 of 40]; p < 0.0001), and average duration of stay was significantly lower (1.3 vs. 5.1 days; p < 0.0001) in group 2 vs. group 1, respectively. Hospital charges were decreased by $5510 per patient in group 2. We conclude that hospital costs can be significantly reduced for most patients undergoing CEA when they are admitted on the day of surgery and discharged the following morning, with no negative impact on morbidity and mortality.

摘要

相似文献

1
Safety and cost-efficiency of 24-hour hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;10(2):143-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02000758.
2
Carotid endarterectomy is more cost-effective than carotid artery stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术比颈动脉支架置入术更具成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.045. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
3
Contemporary predictors of extended postoperative hospital length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术术后延长住院时间的当代预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.090. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
4
Impact of clinical pathways on hospital costs and early outcome after major vascular surgery.临床路径对大血管手术后医院成本及早期预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Dec;22(6):649-57; discussion 657-60. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70055-2.
5
Perioperative morbidity and mortality in combined vs. staged approaches to carotid and coronary revascularization.颈动脉和冠状动脉血运重建联合手术与分期手术的围手术期发病率和死亡率
Ann Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;10(2):138-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02000757.
6
Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of carotid artery angioplasty with stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术与支架置入术对比颈动脉内膜切除术的临床疗效及成本比较
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.049.
7
Correlation of carotid artery stump pressure and neurologic changes during 474 carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients.474例清醒患者行颈动脉内膜剥脱术期间颈动脉残端压力与神经功能变化的相关性
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.06.003.
8
Modifiable Factors Leading to Increased Length of Stay after Carotid Endarterectomy.导致颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间延长的可改变因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.126. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
9
Five-step protocol for carotid endarterectomy in the managed health care era.管理式医疗保健时代颈动脉内膜切除术的五步方案。
Surgery. 1999 Jan;125(1):96-101.
10
Factors predicting prolonged length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间延长的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Sep;32(3):550-4. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.107759.

引用本文的文献

1
Day of surgery admission in urology: Patient criteria and the organization required for same-day admission in urology: A retrospective study.泌尿外科手术入院日:患者标准及泌尿外科当日入院所需的组织架构:一项回顾性研究。
Urol Ann. 2023 Oct-Dec;15(4):368-372. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_148_22. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Carotid Endarterectomy: experience in 8743 cases.颈动脉内膜切除术:8743例手术经验。
HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2009;1(3):33-45.