Suppr超能文献

颈动脉和冠状动脉血运重建联合手术与分期手术的围手术期发病率和死亡率

Perioperative morbidity and mortality in combined vs. staged approaches to carotid and coronary revascularization.

作者信息

Giangola G, Migaly J, Riles T S, Lamparello P J, Adelman M A, Grossi E, Colvin S B, Pasternak P F, Galloway A, Culliford A T, Esposito R, Ribacove G, Crawford B K, Glassman L, Baumann F G, Spencer F C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;10(2):138-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02000757.

Abstract

Between 1986 and 1994 we identified 57 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during the same hospitalization. Simultaneous CABG and CEA was performed in 28 patients (mean age 70.5 years, 58% male). Indications for CABG in these patients were myocardial infarction in two crescendo angina in 19, congestive heart failure in two and left main or triple-vessel coronary artery disease noted during carotid preoperative evaluation in five. Indications for CEA were transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 12, crescendo TIA in six, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in five, and asymptomatic stenosis in five. There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions or perioperative deaths. Two patients developed atrial fibrillation, and four patients had CVAs (two were ipsilateral to the side of CEA). Twenty-nine patients underwent staged procedures (i.e., not performed concomitantly but during the same hospitalization). Indications for CABG and CEA were comparable to those in the group undergoing simultaneous procedures. In 17 patients CEA was performed before CABG. There was a single CVA, the result of an intracerebral hemorrhage. Five of the 17 patients had a myocardial infarction and two died; one patient had first-degree heart block requiring a pacemaker. Four additional patients developed atrial fibrillation, one of whom required cardioversion. The remaining 12 patients had CABG followed by CEA. There were no CVAs, myocardial infarctions, arrhythmias, or deaths in this subgroup. These data demonstrate that the performance of simultaneous CABG and CEA procedures is associated with increased neurologic morbidity (14.3%), both ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of carotid surgery in contrast to staged CABG and CEA (3.4%). In addition, when staged carotid surgery preceded coronary revascularization in those with severe coronary artery disease, the combined cardiac complication and mortality rate was significantly higher than when coronary revascularization preceded CEA. This evidence suggests that when CABG and CEA must be performed during the same hospitalization, the procedures should be staged with CABG preceding CEA.

摘要

1986年至1994年间,我们确定了57例在同一住院期间接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者。28例患者同时进行了CABG和CEA(平均年龄70.5岁,58%为男性)。这些患者进行CABG的指征为:2例心肌梗死、19例进行性心绞痛、2例充血性心力衰竭以及5例在颈动脉术前评估时发现左主干或三支血管冠状动脉疾病。CEA的指征为:12例短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、6例进行性TIA、5例脑血管意外(CVA)以及5例无症状狭窄。术后无心肌梗死或围手术期死亡。2例患者发生心房颤动,4例患者发生CVA(2例与CEA同侧)。29例患者接受分期手术(即不同时进行,但在同一住院期间进行)。CABG和CEA的指征与同期手术组相似。17例患者在CABG之前进行了CEA。发生1例CVA,为脑出血所致。17例患者中有5例发生心肌梗死,2例死亡;1例患者发生一度心脏传导阻滞,需要安装起搏器。另外4例患者发生心房颤动,其中1例需要进行心脏复律。其余12例患者先进行CABG,然后进行CEA。该亚组无CVA、心肌梗死、心律失常或死亡。这些数据表明,与分期CABG和CEA(3.4%)相比,同时进行CABG和CEA手术与神经并发症增加(14.3%)相关,且与颈动脉手术侧同侧和对侧均有关。此外,在患有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者中,当分期颈动脉手术先于冠状动脉血运重建时,心脏并发症和死亡率的综合发生率显著高于冠状动脉血运重建先于CEA时。这一证据表明,当必须在同一住院期间进行CABG和CEA时,手术应分期进行,CABG先于CEA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验