Suppr超能文献

我们能否解决过程分离模型之间的矛盾?

Can we resolve contradictions between process dissociation models?

作者信息

Cowan N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 1996 Mar-Jun;5(1-2):255-9. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0016.

Abstract

Wainwright and Reingold (1996) presented equations for various versions of the process dissociation procedure that has been used to separate conscious and unconscious memory process. In the present reply it is suggested that these equations, though helpful, may not capture some of the key theoretical possibilities that could help to resolve apparent contradictions and paradoxes in the empirical literature. Specifically, there could be an independence of processes that might be estimated to a sufficient degree of accuracy for some theoretical purposes despite a violation of the assumption of stochastic independence.

摘要

温赖特和赖因戈尔德(1996年)提出了用于各种版本的过程分离程序的方程,该程序已被用于区分有意识和无意识的记忆过程。在本回复中,有人认为这些方程虽然有用,但可能没有涵盖一些关键的理论可能性,而这些可能性有助于解决实证文献中明显的矛盾和悖论。具体而言,尽管违反了随机独立性假设,但对于某些理论目的而言,过程之间可能存在独立性,且这种独立性可能被估计到足够的准确程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验