• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人类识别记忆中区分熟悉感与回忆:短保持间隔内不同的遗忘速率。

Dissociating familiarity from recollection in human recognition memory: different rates of forgetting over short retention intervals.

作者信息

Yonelinas Andrew P, Levy Benjamin J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):575-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03196315.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196315
PMID:12412899
Abstract

Two functionally distinct forms of recognition memory have been identified in human and nonhuman species-the ability to recollect qualitative information about previous events, and the ability to differentiate between familiar and novel stimuli. Separate dual-process theories have been developed in the animal and human literatures to account for these findings. However, it is not clear whether these theories describe the same two underlying memory processes. On the basis of animal studies of medial temporal lobe function, familiarity is expected to exhibit disproportionately fast forgetting compared with recollection over short retention intervals. We tested this prediction in healthy human subjects by examining recognition forgetting rates across a range of 8-32 intervening items and found significant forgetting in the accuracy of familiarity-based discriminations and no evidence of forgetting in the accuracy of recollection-based discriminations. In agreement with the results from nonhuman species, the present results indicate that item familiarity decreases more rapidly than recollection over short retention intervals.

摘要

在人类和非人类物种中已识别出两种功能不同的识别记忆形式——回忆先前事件定性信息的能力,以及区分熟悉和新颖刺激的能力。动物和人类文献中已分别发展出双过程理论来解释这些发现。然而,尚不清楚这些理论是否描述了相同的两个潜在记忆过程。基于对内侧颞叶功能的动物研究,预计在短保留间隔内,熟悉度相比回忆会表现出不成比例的快速遗忘。我们通过检查8至32个间隔项目范围内的识别遗忘率,在健康人类受试者中测试了这一预测,发现基于熟悉度的辨别准确性存在显著遗忘,而基于回忆的辨别准确性没有遗忘迹象。与非人类物种的结果一致,目前的结果表明,在短保留间隔内,项目熟悉度的下降比回忆更快。

相似文献

1
Dissociating familiarity from recollection in human recognition memory: different rates of forgetting over short retention intervals.在人类识别记忆中区分熟悉感与回忆:短保持间隔内不同的遗忘速率。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):575-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03196315.
2
Effects of retention intervals on receiver operating characteristics in artificial grammar learning.记忆间隔对人工语法学习中接收者操作特征的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 May;125(1):37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
3
Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.记忆与知晓:编码时而非检索时的电生理差异。
Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):280-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.048. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
4
Process dissociation of familiarity and recollection in children: response deadline affects recollection but not familiarity.儿童中熟悉性与回忆的加工分离:反应截止时间影响回忆但不影响熟悉性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:120-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
5
Recollection and familiarity for public events in neurologically intact older adults and two brain-damaged patients.神经健全的老年个体和两位脑损伤患者对公共事件的记忆和熟悉度。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Mar;48(4):945-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.015. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
6
Contribution of recollection and familiarity judgements to rate of forgetting in organic amnesia.
Cortex. 2002 Apr;38(2):161-78. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70648-8.
7
Effects of learning experience on forgetting rates of item and associative memories.学习经历对项目记忆和联想记忆遗忘率的影响。
Learn Mem. 2016 Jun 17;23(7):365-78. doi: 10.1101/lm.041210.115. Print 2016 Jul.
8
Forgetting of the recollection and familiarity components of recognition in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者对识别中回忆和熟悉度成分的遗忘
J Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;12(2):231-247. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12114. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.内侧颞叶与识别记忆。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328.
10
Combined pharmacological and electrophysiological dissociation of familiarity and recollection.熟悉感与回忆的药理学和电生理学联合解离
J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 15;26(7):1979-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5370-05.2006.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlates of Theta and Gamma Activity during Visuospatial Incidental/Intentional Encoding and Retrieval Indicate Differences in Processing in Young and Elderly Healthy Participants.视觉空间偶然/有意编码与检索过程中θ波和γ波活动的相关因素表明,年轻和老年健康参与者在处理过程中存在差异。
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 2;14(8):786. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080786.
2
Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.考察独立纠正后反驳效应的可重复性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 3;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00492-z.
3
Attentional attenuation (rather than attentional boost) through task switching leads to a selective long-term memory decline.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of item and source forgetting.项目和来源遗忘的比较。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):254-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03210966.
2
Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments.认知记忆判断中再认经验的神经生理学表现。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.1.
3
Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory.意识、控制和信心:识别记忆的三个C
通过任务切换导致的注意力衰减(而非注意力增强)会导致选择性的长期记忆衰退。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1027871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027871. eCollection 2022.
4
Use of connectotyping on task functional MRI data reveals dynamic network level cross talking during task performance.在任务功能磁共振成像数据上使用连接分型揭示了任务执行过程中动态网络水平的交互作用。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 10;16:951907. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.951907. eCollection 2022.
5
Episodic recognition memory and the hippocampus in Parkinson's disease: A review.帕金森病中的情景式识别记忆与海马体:综述。
Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:191-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
Word Familiarity Modulated the Effects of Category Familiarity on Memory Performance.单词熟悉度调节了类别熟悉度对记忆表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 8;9:1429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01429. eCollection 2018.
7
The posterior parietal cortex and subjectively perceived confidence during memory retrieval.后顶叶皮层和记忆提取过程中的主观置信度。
Learn Mem. 2018 Jul 16;25(8):382-389. doi: 10.1101/lm.048033.118. Print 2018 Aug.
8
Context and Time Matter: Effects of Emotion and Motivation on Episodic Memory Overtime.情境和时间很重要:情绪和动机对情节记忆随时间的影响。
Neural Plast. 2018 Apr 8;2018:7051925. doi: 10.1155/2018/7051925. eCollection 2018.
9
Rats Remember Items in Context Using Episodic Memory.大鼠利用情景记忆记住特定情境中的物品。
Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 24;26(20):2821-2826. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
Parallel Engagement of Regions Associated with Encoding and Later Retrieval Forms Durable Memories.与编码及后期检索相关区域的并行参与形成持久记忆。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jul 27;36(30):7985-95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0830-16.2016.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):361-79. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.361.
4
Theta synchronization during episodic retrieval: neural correlates of conscious awareness.情景记忆检索过程中的θ同步:意识觉知的神经关联
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Aug;12(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00024-6.
5
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis.情景记忆、失忆症与海马体-前丘脑轴
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Jun;22(3):425-44; discussion 444-89.
6
Hippocampal, parahippocampal and occipital-temporal contributions to associative and item recognition memory: an fMRI study.海马体、海马旁回和枕颞叶对联想和项目识别记忆的贡献:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12;12(2):359-63. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200102120-00035.
7
Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.回忆与熟悉感的脑电位
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):923-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03209340.
8
Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval.记忆事件:海马体在提取过程中的选择性作用。
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3(11):1149-52. doi: 10.1038/80671.
9
Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region.仅限于海马区受损后猴子的识别记忆受损。
J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1;20(1):451-63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-01-00451.2000.
10
Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.项目及联想识别中的熟悉感与回忆
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):657-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03211559.