• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

司帕沙星治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的比较安全性和疗效:一项双盲、随机、平行、多中心研究。

Comparative safety and efficacy of sparfloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, randomised, parallel, multicentre study.

作者信息

Allegra L, Konietzko N, Leophonte P, Hosie J, Pauwels R, Guyen J N, Petitpretz P

机构信息

I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Maggioze, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:93-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.93.

DOI:10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.93
PMID:8737129
Abstract

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were randomly allocated to oral treatment with sparfloxacin (200 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg once daily) or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (500 mg/125 mg tds) for a total treatment duration of 7 to 14 days. Patients were evaluable if they had a FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 70% at stable state and presented with a suspected infectious exacerbation defined as increases in dyspnoea, sputum volume and sputum purulence. The primary efficacy variable was the overall success (defined as disappearance or improvement of dyspnoea and reductions in sputum volume and purulence) at end of treatment and follow-up. Overall efficacy was assessed in both the intent-to-treat (728 patients) and the evaluable (351 patients) populations. At the end of treatment and follow-up, success rates were identical for the sparfloxacin (87.3% and 78.7%) and amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (88.8% and 79.8%) treatment groups. Similar figures were found for the intent-to-treat population. The analysis of drug safety was similar for both treatment groups. The most frequently encountered pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Sparfloxacin appeared superior for bacteriological eradication of Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Sparfloxacin in a single daily dose appears at least as effective as amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.

摘要

在一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期患者被随机分配接受口服司帕沙星治疗(负荷剂量200mg,随后每日100mg)或阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗(500mg/125mg,每日三次),总治疗疗程为7至14天。如果患者在稳定状态下FEV1/FVC比值低于70%,且出现疑似感染加重,定义为呼吸困难加重、痰液量增加和痰液脓性增加,则可进行评估。主要疗效变量是治疗结束和随访时的总体成功(定义为呼吸困难消失或改善以及痰液量和脓性减少)。在意向性治疗人群(728例患者)和可评估人群(351例患者)中评估总体疗效。在治疗结束和随访时,司帕沙星治疗组(87.3%和78.7%)和阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗组(88.8%和79.8%)的成功率相同。在意向性治疗人群中也发现了类似的数据。两个治疗组的药物安全性分析相似。最常遇到的病原体是肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌。司帕沙星在根除流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌方面似乎更具优势。司帕沙星每日单剂量治疗COPD急性加重期患者至少与阿莫西林/克拉维酸一样有效。

相似文献

1
Comparative safety and efficacy of sparfloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, randomised, parallel, multicentre study.司帕沙星治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的比较安全性和疗效:一项双盲、随机、平行、多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:93-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.93.
2
Sparfloxacin vs ofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, comparative study. Sparfloxacin Multicenter ABECB Study Group.司帕沙星与氧氟沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染加重期的多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。司帕沙星多中心ABECB研究组
Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):120-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.120.
3
Multicentre in-vitro evaluation of the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis to ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, co-amoxiclav and sparfloxacin.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Mar;39(3):411-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.3.411.
4
Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized comparison of sparfloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and erythromycin.社区获得性肺炎的治疗:司帕沙星、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和红霉素的随机对照比较
Eur Respir J. 1995 Dec;8(12):1999-2007. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08121999.
5
Exacerbation of COPD: amoxicillin + clavulanic acid in vitro activity vs S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期:阿莫西林+克拉维酸对肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌的体外活性
J Chemother. 1995 Nov;7 Suppl 4:61-2.
6
Gemifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 070 Clinical Study group.吉米沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效比较。070临床研究组。
J Chemother. 2000 Aug;12(4):314-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.2000.12.4.314.
7
Sparfloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a pooled data analysis of two studies.司帕沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎:两项研究的汇总数据分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:73-82. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.73.
8
Randomized, double-blind, comparative study of grepafloxacin and amoxycillin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.格帕沙星与阿莫西林治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲、对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Dec;40 Suppl A:73-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.suppl_1.73.
9
A double-blind comparison of low-dose ofloxacin and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.低剂量氧氟沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的双盲对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Nov;26 Suppl D:75-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_d.75.
10
Amoxycillin/clavulanate in acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Mar;19(3):373-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.3.373.

引用本文的文献

1
2021 Guideline for the Management of COPD Exacerbations: Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) / Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) Clinical Practice Guideline Task Force.《2021年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重管理指南:土耳其急诊医学协会(EMAT)/土耳其胸科学会(TTS)临床实践指南工作组》
Turk J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):137-176. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.329630. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
2
Antibiotics for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 29;10(10):CD010257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010257.pub2.
3
Antibiotics for treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.
抗生素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重:网络荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0541-0.
4
The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review.新型氟喹诺酮类药物:批判性综述。
Can J Infect Dis. 1999 May;10(3):207-38. doi: 10.1155/1999/378394.
5
Bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2000: a state-of-the-art review.2000年慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的细菌感染:最新综述
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):336-63. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.336-363.2001.
6
Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: what role for the new fluoroquinolones?慢性支气管炎急性加重:新型氟喹诺酮类药物有何作用?
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118010-00001.
7
New Fluoroquinolones: Real and Potential Roles.新型氟喹诺酮类药物:实际与潜在作用
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 1999 Dec;1(5):470-479. doi: 10.1007/s11908-999-0061-z.
8
The next generation: fluoroquinolones in the management of acute lower respiratory infection in adults.下一代:氟喹诺酮类药物在成人急性下呼吸道感染治疗中的应用
Thorax. 2000 Jan;55(1):83-5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.1.83.
9
Potential interactions of the extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones with the CNS.广谱氟喹诺酮类药物与中枢神经系统的潜在相互作用。
Drug Saf. 1999 Aug;21(2):123-35. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199921020-00005.
10
Trovafloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Jun;17(6):434-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01691579.