• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎的治疗:司帕沙星、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和红霉素的随机对照比较

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized comparison of sparfloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and erythromycin.

作者信息

Lode H, Garau J, Grassi C, Hosie J, Huchon G, Legakis N, Segev S, Wijnands G

机构信息

Pneumology Dept I, Hospital Zehlendorf, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1995 Dec;8(12):1999-2007. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08121999.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.95.08121999
PMID:8666093
Abstract

The treatment of community-acquired pneumonia is empirical in most cases and must cover a wide range of potential pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant strains, Haemophilus influenzae and intracellular microorganisms. The objective of this double-blind, randomized, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin (400 mg loading dose, followed by 200 mg o.d.) with that of oral amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (500/125 mg t.i.d.) or oral erythromycin (1 g b.i.d.), during 7-14 days in 808 patients with confirmed community-acquired pneumonia. The overall success rates for sparfloxacin (87%), amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (80%) and erythromycin (85%) were similar in evaluable patients, and the equivalence hypothesis used for the statistical analysis showed at least an equivalent efficacy for the three antibiotics tested. The analysis of microbiologically documented infections (40% of the patients) showed that overall success rates were similar for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae infections. Treatment withdrawal was necessary in 3.5, 2.5 and 7.7% of the patients treated with sparfloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and erythromycin, respectively. This study indicates that sparfloxacin was at least as effective as amoxycillin-clavulanic acid or erythromycin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia and that the adverse effects were similar in the three groups.

摘要

在大多数情况下,社区获得性肺炎的治疗是经验性的,必须覆盖多种潜在病原体,如肺炎链球菌(包括耐青霉素菌株)、流感嗜血杆菌和细胞内微生物。这项双盲、随机、平行组研究的目的是比较司帕沙星(400mg负荷剂量,随后每日200mg)与口服阿莫西林-克拉维酸(500/125mg每日三次)或口服红霉素(1g每日两次)在808例确诊的社区获得性肺炎患者中治疗7 - 14天的疗效和安全性。在可评估的患者中,司帕沙星(87%)、阿莫西林-克拉维酸(80%)和红霉素(85%)的总体成功率相似,用于统计分析的等效性假设表明,所测试的三种抗生素至少具有等效疗效。对微生物学确诊感染(占患者的40%)的分析表明,肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌感染的总体成功率相似。接受司帕沙星、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和红霉素治疗的患者中,分别有3.5%、2.5%和7.7%的患者需要停药。这项研究表明,司帕沙星在治疗轻至中度社区获得性肺炎方面至少与阿莫西林-克拉维酸或红霉素一样有效,且三组的不良反应相似。

相似文献

1
Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized comparison of sparfloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and erythromycin.社区获得性肺炎的治疗:司帕沙星、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和红霉素的随机对照比较
Eur Respir J. 1995 Dec;8(12):1999-2007. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08121999.
2
Sparfloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a pooled data analysis of two studies.司帕沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎:两项研究的汇总数据分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:73-82. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.73.
3
Comparative efficacy of sparfloxacin in comparison with amoxycillin plus ofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. French Study Group.司帕沙星与阿莫西林加氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较。法国研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:83-91. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.83.
4
Comparison of oral cefuroxime axetil and oral amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.口服头孢呋辛酯与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Mar;37(3):555-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.3.555.
5
Randomized, double-blind, comparative study of grepafloxacin and amoxycillin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.格帕沙星与阿莫西林治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲、对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Dec;40 Suppl A:73-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.suppl_1.73.
6
Comparative safety and efficacy of sparfloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, randomised, parallel, multicentre study.司帕沙星治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的比较安全性和疗效:一项双盲、随机、平行、多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:93-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.93.
7
Once-daily sparfloxacin versus high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. Sparfloxacin European Study Group.每日一次服用司帕沙星与高剂量阿莫西林治疗成人社区获得性疑似肺炎球菌肺炎的对照研究。司帕沙星欧洲研究小组
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jun;26(6):1312-20. doi: 10.1086/516366.
8
Penicillin G/ofloxacin versus erythromycin/amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.青霉素G/氧氟沙星与红霉素/阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;13(8):639-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01973989.
9
The efficacy and safety of oral pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxycillin-clavulanate 2000/125 mg, twice daily, versus oral amoxycillin-clavulanate 1000/125 mg, three times daily, for the treatment of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in adults.口服药代动力学增强型阿莫西林-克拉维酸2000/125毫克,每日两次,与口服阿莫西林-克拉维酸1000/125毫克,每日三次,用于治疗成人细菌性社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Aug;20(2):119-29. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00126-7.
10
Sparfloxacin versus cefaclor in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-masked, comparative, multicenter study.司帕沙星与头孢克洛治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲、对照、多中心研究
Clin Ther. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):936-53. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80047-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with : a systematic review and network meta-analysis.四环素类和喹诺酮类药物在[人群]中的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 4;71:102589. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102589. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Efficacy of Empiric Antibiotic Coverage in Community-Acquired Pneumonia Associated with Each Atypical Bacteria: A Meta-Analysis.经验性抗生素覆盖对每种非典型细菌所致社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 23;10(19):4321. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194321.
3
Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
氟喹诺酮类药物与大环内酯类药物治疗军团菌肺炎哪个效果更佳?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):1979-1989. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa441.
4
Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.用于成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 9;2014(10):CD002109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002109.pub4.
5
Clinical evaluation of the tolerability and efficacy of trovafloxacin compared with sparfloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.比较托氟沙星与司帕沙星治疗下呼吸道感染的耐受性和疗效的临床评估。
Clin Drug Investig. 2000;20(2):95-100. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200020020-00004.
6
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.住院成人社区获得性肺炎非典型病原体的经验性抗生素覆盖。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD004418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004418.pub4.
7
The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review.新型氟喹诺酮类药物:批判性综述。
Can J Infect Dis. 1999 May;10(3):207-38. doi: 10.1155/1999/378394.
8
Role of beta-lactam agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.β-内酰胺类药物在社区获得性肺炎治疗中的作用
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Feb;24(2):83-99. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-1287-9.
9
Effectiveness of beta lactam antibiotics compared with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in non-severe community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis.β-内酰胺类抗生素与抗非典型病原体活性抗生素治疗非重症社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较:荟萃分析
BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38334.591586.82. Epub 2005 Jan 31.
10
Empiric oral monotherapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: an idea whose time has come.针对社区获得性肺炎住院患者的经验性口服单药治疗:一个时机已到的理念。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;23(2):78-81. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-1061-9. Epub 2004 Jan 15.