• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sparfloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute purulent sinusitis. Sinusitis Study Group.

作者信息

Gehanno P, Berche P

机构信息

Service d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:105-14. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.105.

DOI:10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.105
PMID:8737130
Abstract

In a double-blind, multicentre trial, 382 patients with a diagnosis of acute purulent sinusitis were randomised to receive sparfloxacin 200 mg once daily for 5 days following a loading dose of 400 mg on day 1 (n = 193) or cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 8 days (n = 189). Patients were classified as success or failure according to clinical symptoms plus bacteriological and radiological data at the end of treatment and at a follow-up visit. In analyses of the intent-to-treat (n = 374) and evaluable populations (n = 304), the 5 day course of sparfloxacin was at least as effective and well tolerated as the 8 day course of cefuroxime axetil. The success rates at the end of treatment in the evaluable population were 82.6% and 83.2% in the sparfloxacin and cefuroxime axetil groups, respectively. The pathogens isolated most frequently were Haemophilus influenzae (33%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (28%). Response rates according to the bacterial aetiology of the acute sinusitis were similar in the two treatment groups. Both drugs were well tolerated. The commonest adverse events were gastrointestinal and were reported in 2.6% and 3.8% of sparfloxacin- and cefuroxime axetil-treated patients, respectively.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sparfloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute purulent sinusitis. Sinusitis Study Group.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:105-14. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.105.
2
A comparison of the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults. The Sinusitis Study Group.莫西沙星(BAY 12 - 8039)与头孢呋辛酯治疗成人急性细菌性鼻窦炎的安全性和有效性比较。鼻窦炎研究组。
Respir Med. 2000 Apr;94(4):337-44. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0769.
3
Ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.环丙沙星与头孢呋辛酯治疗成人急性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效比较
J Otolaryngol. 1998 Feb;27(1):10-6.
4
Comparison of moxifloxacin and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.
Clin Ther. 1999 Oct;21(10):1664-77. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80046-0.
5
Ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.环丙沙星与头孢呋辛酯治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的对比研究。鼻窦炎感染研究组。
J Otolaryngol. 1999 Feb;28(1):3-12.
6
A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.一项多中心随机研究,比较静脉注射和/或口服左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Sep;41(9):1965-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.9.1965.
7
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性细菌性上颌窦炎患者的临床比较
Am J Med. 1992 Sep;93(3):271-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90232-z.
8
Comparative study of cefuroxime axetil and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute sinusitis in general practice.
J Int Med Res. 1989 Nov-Dec;17(6):547-51. doi: 10.1177/030006058901700608.
9
Comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的比较。
Clin Ther. 1999 Jul;21(7):1158-70. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)80019-3.
10
Comparative evaluation of cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor for treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.头孢呋辛酯与头孢克洛治疗急性细菌性上颌窦炎的对比评价
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Dec;115(12):1430-3. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860360032012.

引用本文的文献

1
Sparfloxacin in the treatment of purulent sinusitis-a multicentric study in Indian patients.司帕沙星治疗化脓性鼻窦炎——一项针对印度患者的多中心研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Jan;51(1):80-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02996857.
2
Sparfloxacin: An Overview of Its Efficacy in ENT Infections.司帕沙星:其在耳鼻喉感染中疗效的概述
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Oct;49(4):415-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02994667.
3
Fluoroquinolones compared with beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
氟喹诺酮类药物与β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2008 Mar 25;178(7):845-54. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071157.
4
Eradication of common pathogens at days 2, 3 and 4 of moxifloxacin therapy in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者在莫西沙星治疗第2、3和4天时常见病原体的清除情况。
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2006 Apr 28;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-6-8.
5
Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.头孢呋辛酯:关于其在细菌感染治疗中应用的最新综述
Drugs. 2001;61(10):1455-500. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161100-00008.
6
The Role of Quinolones in Upper Respiratory Tract Infections.喹诺酮类药物在上呼吸道感染中的作用。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2001 Jun;3(3):224-232. doi: 10.1007/s11908-001-0024-5.
7
[Role of new fluoroquinolones in respiratory infections in primary care].[新型氟喹诺酮类药物在基层医疗中呼吸道感染治疗中的作用]
Aten Primaria. 2000 Apr 30;25(7):512-7. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78557-x.
8
Potential interactions of the extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones with the CNS.广谱氟喹诺酮类药物与中枢神经系统的潜在相互作用。
Drug Saf. 1999 Aug;21(2):123-35. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199921020-00005.
9
Economic evaluation of antibacterials in the treatment of acute sinusitis.抗菌药物治疗急性鼻窦炎的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jan;15(1):97-113. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915010-00007.