Klein G L, Whalen E, Echols R M, Heyd A
San Diego Clinical Research Associates, California, USA.
J Otolaryngol. 1998 Feb;27(1):10-6.
This study compared the use and efficacy of ciprofloxacin to cefuroxime axetil for adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.
We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study of oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) versus cefuroxime axetil (250 mg twice daily) for 2 to 3 weeks in the treatment of adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial maxillary sinus infections or acute exacerbation of chronic bacterial sinusitis. Patients with microbiologically and radiologically confirmed sinusitis infection composed the efficacy population.
Of the 83 patients enrolled, 13 of 42 (31%) ciprofloxacin- and 19 of 41 (46%) cefuroxime axetil-treated patients had a respiratory pathogen isolated from a sinus aspiration. The most frequent pretherapy isolated included Haemophilus influenzae (11), streptococcus species (20), staphylococcus species (7), Proteus mirabilis (3), and Neisseria sicca (3). At the end of therapy, clinical resolution or improvement in efficacy-valid patients was achieved in 12 (100%) ciprofloxacin-treated patients and in 14 (74%) cefuroxime axetil recipients. The five (26%) cefuroxime axetil clinical failures were due to development of superinfection. Bacteriologic eradication occurred in 12 (100%) and 14 (100%) ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil patients, respectively. Similar clinical and bacteriologic response rates were observed at the 2- to 4-week follow-up. Among 83 intent-to-treat patients, 19 (45%) ciprofloxacin and 14 (34%) cefuroxime axetil patients had drug-related adverse events. The most common adverse event in both treatment groups was gastrointestinal.
This pilot study suggests that ciprofloxacin is efficacious in the management of acute bacterial sinusitis.
本研究比较环丙沙星与头孢呋辛酯在成年急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者中的使用情况及疗效。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲的试点研究,比较口服环丙沙星(每日两次,每次500毫克)与头孢呋辛酯(每日两次,每次250毫克)治疗2至3周对临床诊断为急性细菌性上颌窦感染或慢性细菌性鼻窦炎急性加重的成年患者的疗效。微生物学和放射学确诊为鼻窦炎感染的患者构成疗效评估人群。
在纳入的83例患者中,环丙沙星治疗的42例患者中有13例(31%)、头孢呋辛酯治疗的41例患者中有19例(46%)从鼻窦穿刺中分离出呼吸道病原体。治疗前最常分离出的病原体包括流感嗜血杆菌(11例)、链球菌属(20例)、葡萄球菌属(7例)、奇异变形杆菌(3例)和干燥奈瑟菌(3例)。治疗结束时,环丙沙星治疗的12例(100%)疗效有效患者实现了临床缓解或改善,头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者中有14例(74%)实现了临床缓解或改善。头孢呋辛酯治疗的5例(26%)临床失败是由于发生了二重感染。环丙沙星组和头孢呋辛酯组的细菌清除率分别为12例(100%)和14例(100%)。在2至4周的随访中观察到了相似的临床和细菌学反应率。在83例意向性治疗患者中,环丙沙星组有19例(45%)、头孢呋辛酯组有14例(34%)患者出现药物相关不良事件。两个治疗组最常见的不良事件是胃肠道反应。
这项试点研究表明环丙沙星在治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎方面是有效的。