Wilson G J, Murphy A J
Centre for Exercise Science and Sport Management, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
J Sports Sci. 1996 Apr;14(2):167-73. doi: 10.1080/02640419608727698.
The aim of this study was to determine if pre-training strength and power tests could provide data that effectively discriminated between subjects whose cycling performance improved considerably from training, from those who did not. Twenty active healthy male subjects performed 10 weeks of plyometric or weight training. Prior to and at the completion of the training, the following tests were performed: (1) a 6-s cycle ride; (2) isokinetic leg extension at 1.05 and 5.24 rads s-1; and (3) a maximum isometric squat. The subjects in the two training groups were separated into those whose cycling performance improved significantly as a result of the training (good) and those who did not (poor). The pre-training muscular function tests of the good versus poor achievers were then compared, individually for each form of training, to determine if they could be used to discriminate between the two subject groups. The pre-training isometric data effectively discriminated between those individuals who improved their cycling performance significantly as a consequence of training and those who did not. While this finding has practical implications for the exercise science field, further research is required before generally useful normative data can be used with confidence to prescribe individual specific training programmes.
本研究的目的是确定训练前的力量和功率测试能否提供有效数据，以区分自行车运动表现因训练而显著提高的受试者与未提高的受试者。20名健康的男性受试者进行了为期10周的增强式训练或重量训练。在训练前和训练结束时，进行了以下测试：（1）6秒的自行车骑行；（2）在1.05和5.24弧度/秒下的等速腿部伸展；（3）最大等长深蹲。两个训练组的受试者被分为自行车运动表现因训练而显著提高的受试者（良好）和未提高的受试者（不佳）。然后分别针对每种训练形式，比较表现良好与不佳的受试者训练前的肌肉功能测试结果，以确定这些测试是否可用于区分这两组受试者。训练前的等长数据有效地区分了因训练而自行车运动表现显著提高的个体与未提高的个体。虽然这一发现对运动科学领域具有实际意义，但在能够自信地使用普遍有用的标准数据来制定个体特定训练计划之前，还需要进一步研究。
