Barry K P, Mesgarzadeh M, Triolo J, Moyer R, Tehranzadeh J, Bonakdarpour A
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 1996 May;25(4):365-70. doi: 10.1007/s002560050096.
The purpose of this study was to determine the different patterns of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears on MRI and the prevalence and accuracy of these patterns. Images were obtained on high-tesla and low-tesla units and the results compared to determine whether field strength affects the interpretation using the grading system. In 172 patients who underwent knee MRI (109 knees with high-tesla units and 63 knees with low-tesla units) and arthroscopy, there was a total of 91 arthroscopically proven ACL tears. Five patterns of ACL tears were observed and designated as type 1 (diffuse increase in signal on T2-weighted images and enlargement of the ligament, 48%); type 2 (horizontally oriented ACL, 21%); type 3 (nonvisualization of the ACL, 18%); type 4 (discontinuity of the ACL, 11%); and type 5 (vertically oriented ACL, 2%). The positive predictive value (PPV) for type 2, 4, and 5 patterns was 100% for both field strengths: for type 3 PPV was just above 80% for both field strengths. The PPV value for type 1 was 90% for the high-tesla unit and 79% for the low-tesla, unit, which was not statistically significant. Combining the results of both field strengths, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 89%, respectively. Arthroscopic results were also used to determine the association between meniscal and ACL tears. Only 13% of ACL tears were isolated, the rest being associated with meniscal tears. Forty-five percent of medial meniscal and 50% of lateral meniscal tears were associated with an ACL tear, and 94% of ACLs were torn when both menisci were torn.
本研究的目的是确定前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂在磁共振成像(MRI)上的不同模式以及这些模式的发生率和准确性。在高场强和低场强设备上获取图像,并比较结果以确定场强是否会影响使用分级系统的解读。在172例行膝关节MRI检查(109例使用高场强设备,63例使用低场强设备)并接受关节镜检查的患者中,共有91例经关节镜证实为ACL撕裂。观察到ACL撕裂的五种模式,并分别命名为1型(T2加权图像上信号弥漫性增加且韧带增粗,48%);2型(水平走行的ACL,21%);3型(ACL未显示,18%);4型(ACL连续性中断,11%);5型(垂直走行的ACL,2%)。对于2型、4型和5型模式,两种场强下的阳性预测值(PPV)均为100%:对于3型,两种场强下的PPV均略高于80%。1型的PPV在高场强设备下为90%,在低场强设备下为79%,差异无统计学意义。综合两种场强的结果,总体敏感性和特异性分别为93%和89%。关节镜检查结果还用于确定半月板撕裂与ACL撕裂之间的关联。只有13%的ACL撕裂是孤立的,其余均与半月板撕裂相关。45%的内侧半月板撕裂和50%的外侧半月板撕裂与ACL撕裂相关,当双侧半月板均撕裂时,94%的ACL也会撕裂。