Suppr超能文献

晚期乳腺癌的肿瘤增殖活性及对一线化疗的反应

Tumor proliferative activity and response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast carcinoma.

作者信息

Bonetti A, Zaninelli M, Rodella S, Molino A, Sperotto L, Piubello Q, Bonetti F, Nortilli R, Turazza M, Cetto G L

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology and Pathology, Civic Hospital of Borgo Trento, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38(3):289-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01806148.

Abstract

The relationship between tumor proliferative activity and response to first-line chemotherapy and survival was investigated in 76 advanced breast cancer patients. Proliferative activity was determined by means of Ki-67 immunohistologic staining on primary tumors (55 patients) or at the relapse site (21 patients), and was classified as low ( < or = 25% of stained cells) or high ( > 25% of stained cells). The usual WHO response criteria were used. The median duration of follow-up was 18 months (range 3-58). Forty-seven patients (62%) had tumors with low, and 29 (38%) had tumors with a high rate of proliferative activity. The two groups were well balanced in terms of important variables such as disease-free survival, performance status, age, menopausal status, and the type of first-line chemotherapy (anthracycline-based regimens versus cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil). The estrogen receptor (ER) content, measured by means of immunohistochemical assay, was markedly different in the two groups, with 27/47 tumors with low proliferative activity (57%) and 6/29 with high-proliferative activity (21%) being ER positive ( > or = 45% of stained cells) (p = 0.003). Moreover, a significant difference in the metastatic pattern was also evident, with a higher incidence of bone and a lower incidence of soft tissue metastases in the group of patients with tumors with low proliferative activity (p = 0.004). Overall, 10/47 responses (21%: PR = 7, and CR = 3) were observed in the group with a low rate of proliferative activity, versus 14/29 (48%: PR = 9, and CR = 5) in the group with highly proliferative tumors, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.03). When a multivariate analysis was performed, the only factor that retained independent prognostic significance was the predominant site of disease, particularly soft tissues (p = 0.003). Despite the difference in response rate, when survival analysis was performed according to the Kaplan-Meier method, no significant difference was observed in the two groups, but when the analysis was limited to responsive patients, the median survival observed in those with a low and those with a high rate of proliferation was 35 and 19 months respectively (p = 0.02). The same results were obtained when multivariate survival analysis was carried out using Cox's regression model. These data suggest that there is a link between tumor proliferative activity and response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer, and may indicate the need to use more intensive treatments in selected patients with highly proliferative tumors.

摘要

在76例晚期乳腺癌患者中,研究了肿瘤增殖活性与一线化疗反应及生存之间的关系。通过对原发性肿瘤(55例患者)或复发部位(21例患者)进行Ki-67免疫组织化学染色来确定增殖活性,并将其分为低(染色细胞≤25%)或高(染色细胞>25%)。采用世界卫生组织常用的反应标准。中位随访时间为18个月(范围3 - 58个月)。47例患者(62%)的肿瘤增殖活性低,29例患者(38%)的肿瘤增殖活性高。两组在无病生存期、体能状态、年龄、绝经状态以及一线化疗类型(蒽环类方案与环磷酰胺 - 甲氨蝶呤 - 5 - 氟尿嘧啶)等重要变量方面平衡良好。通过免疫组织化学分析测定的雌激素受体(ER)含量在两组中有显著差异,增殖活性低的47例肿瘤中有27例(57%)ER阳性(染色细胞≥45%),增殖活性高的29例中有6例(21%)ER阳性(p = 0.003)。此外,转移模式也存在显著差异,增殖活性低的肿瘤患者组中骨转移发生率较高,软组织转移发生率较低(p = 0.004)。总体而言,增殖活性低的组中观察到10/47例有反应(21%:PR = 7例,CR = 3例),而增殖活性高的肿瘤组中为14/29例(48%:PR = 9例,CR = 5例),差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.03)。进行多因素分析时,唯一保留独立预后意义的因素是疾病的主要部位,特别是软组织(p = 0.003)。尽管反应率存在差异,但根据Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析时,两组未观察到显著差异,但当分析仅限于有反应的患者时,增殖活性低和高的患者中位生存期分别为35个月和19个月(p = 0.02)。使用Cox回归模型进行多因素生存分析时也得到了相同的结果。这些数据表明,晚期乳腺癌中肿瘤增殖活性与化疗反应之间存在联系,可能表明需要对增殖活性高的特定患者采用更强化的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验