• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A double-blind multicentre comparison of mirtazapine and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients.

作者信息

Høyberg O J, Maragakis B, Mullin J, Norum D, Stordall E, Ekdahl P, Ose E, Moksnes K M, Sennef C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Fylkes Hospital I Molde, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Mar;93(3):184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10629.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10629.x
PMID:8739664
Abstract

A total of 115 elderly patients (60-85 years of age) with DSM III diagnosis of major depressive episode were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with either mirtazapine, 15-45 mg/day, or amitriptyline, 30-90 mg/day. Efficacy was assessed biweekly, using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as primary outcome variables. The treatment with both drugs resulted in a similar reduction of total HRDS and MADRS scores, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups at any assessment point or at endpoint. Statistically significant differences favouring amitriptyline were present according to CGI-Global Improvement Scale at endpoint, HRDS cognitive disturbance factor at weeks 2, 4 and 6 and endpoint and retardation factor at week 6. Adverse events were reported by a similar number of patients in both treatment groups. Additional research is needed to assess further the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine among elderly depressed patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
A double-blind multicentre comparison of mirtazapine and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Mar;93(3):184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10629.x.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder. Nordic Antidepressant Study Group.米氮平与西酞普兰的疗效及耐受性:一项针对重度抑郁症患者的双盲、随机研究。北欧抗抑郁药研究小组
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Nov;14(6):329-37. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199911000-00002.
3
Mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in hospitalized severely depressed patients with melancholic features.米氮平与文拉法辛治疗伴有抑郁特征的住院重度抑郁症患者的疗效比较
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;21(4):425-31. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00010.
4
A double-blind comparison of Org 3770, amitriptyline, and placebo in major depression.奥氮平3770、阿米替林和安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Nov;56(11):519-25.
5
A meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety.一项关于米氮平治疗重度抑郁症及焦虑症状患者的八项随机、双盲、对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;59(3):123-7.
6
Comparison of the effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in severely depressed patients.米氮平与氟西汀对重度抑郁症患者疗效的比较。
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(2):137-46. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519020-00004.
7
Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety studies of mirtazapine versus amitriptyline in major depression.米氮平与阿米替林治疗重度抑郁症的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照疗效与安全性研究的荟萃分析
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1997;391:22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb05955.x.
8
Mirtazapine vs. amitriptyline vs. placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder.米氮平与阿米替林及安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的对比研究
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1990;26(2):191-6.
9
Mirtazapine versus amitriptyline in the long-term treatment of depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Mar;13(2):63-73. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199803000-00002.
10
A double-blind placebo-controlled study of Org 3770 in depressed outpatients.
J Affect Disord. 1995 Jun 8;34(3):165-71. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(95)00014-e.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of adverse outcomes associated with mirtazapine compared to sertraline use among older people living in long-term care facilities.与舍曲林相比,米氮平在长期护理机构老年人中使用时出现不良后果的风险。
Age Ageing. 2025 Mar 28;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf074.
2
Mirtazapine for gastrointestinal and neuropsychological symptoms in older adults with irritable bowel syndrome.米氮平治疗老年肠易激综合征患者的胃肠道和神经心理症状
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 24;18:17562848241278125. doi: 10.1177/17562848241278125. eCollection 2024.
3
Usefulness of mirtazapine and SSRIs in late-life depression: post hoc analysis of the GUNDAM study.
米氮平与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂用于老年期抑郁症的有效性:GUNDAM研究的事后分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;79(11):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03563-8. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Antidepressants for treating depression in dementia.用于治疗痴呆症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 31;8(8):CD003944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003944.pub2.
5
Mirtazapine has a therapeutic potency in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced mice model of Parkinson's disease.米氮平在 1-甲基-4-苯基-1,2,3,6-四氢吡啶(MPTP)诱导的帕金森病小鼠模型中具有治疗效力。
BMC Neurosci. 2014 Jun 25;15:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-79.
6
A review of therapeutic uses of mirtazapine in psychiatric and medical conditions.米氮平在精神疾病和躯体疾病中的治疗用途综述。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(5). doi: 10.4088/PCC.13r01525. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
7
Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.米氮平与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006528.pub2.
8
Treatment of depression in late life.老年期抑郁症的治疗
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 1999 Sep;1(2):113-24. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.1999.1.2/lschneider.
9
Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression and other psychiatric disorders.米氮平:对其在重度抑郁症及其他精神障碍中的应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2009;23(5):427-52. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923050-00006.
10
Use of antidepressants in late-life depression.抗抑郁药在老年抑郁症中的应用。
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(10):841-53. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825100-00003.