• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized comparison of two nystatin oral gels with miconazole oral gel for treatment of oral thrush in infants. Antimycotics Study Group.

作者信息

Hoppe J E, Hahn H

机构信息

Universitäts-Kinderklinik, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Infection. 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):136-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713319.

DOI:10.1007/BF01713319
PMID:8740106
Abstract

Recently, two commercial oral nystatin gels have been marketed in Germany (Candio-Hermal, Hermal; Lederlind, Lederle). In a prospective open randomized multicentre study involving 12 paediatricians in private practice, Candio-Hermal and Lederlind were compared with miconazole oral gel (Daktar, Janssen) in 95 infants with oral thrush (candidosis). Oral and rectal swabs were taken on days 0 and 14. Treatment duration varied according to the amount of drug contained in one tube (Candio-Hermal 10 days; Lederlind 14 days; Daktar 8 days). On day 14, clinical cure was observed in 23 of 27 infants treated with Daktar (85.1%), in 15 of 35 infants treated with Candio-Hermal (42.8%; p < 0.0007); and in 16 of 33 infants treated with Lederlind (48.5%; p < 0.004). Clinical relapses were observed in 15 patients (Candio-Hermal: n = 9; Lederlind: n = 6). The overall oral mycologic cure rate was significantly higher with Daktar (29.6%) and Candio-Hermal (20.0%) than with Lederlind (3.0%; p < 0.005 and < 0.03, respectively). It can be concluded that Daktar oral gel is significantly more effective than Candio-Hermal and Lederlind in curing oral thrush in infants.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized comparison of two nystatin oral gels with miconazole oral gel for treatment of oral thrush in infants. Antimycotics Study Group.
Infection. 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):136-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713319.
2
Treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompetent infants: a randomized multicenter study of miconazole gel vs. nystatin suspension. The Antifungals Study Group.免疫功能正常婴儿口腔念珠菌病的治疗:咪康唑凝胶与制霉菌素混悬液的随机多中心研究。抗真菌药物研究组
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Mar;16(3):288-93. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199703000-00007.
3
[Prospective comparison of miconazole gel and nystatin suspension in the treatment of oral candidiasis].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1983 Sep 24;113(38):1356-62.
4
Topical Antimycotics for Oral Candidiasis in Warfarin Users.华法林使用者口腔念珠菌病的局部抗真菌药
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Apr;120(4):368-372. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12722. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
Antimycotic Treatment of Oral Candidiasis in Warfarin Users.华法林使用者口腔念珠菌病的抗真菌治疗。
Am J Med. 2021 May;134(5):e308-e312. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
6
[Comparative studies on various nystatin preparations (Candio-Hermal ointment, Candio-Hermal paste and their composite forms)].[不同制霉菌素制剂(坎迪欧 - 赫尔马尔软膏、坎迪欧 - 赫尔马尔糊剂及其复合剂型)的比较研究]
Z Haut Geschlechtskr. 1971 Dec 1;46(23):805-8.
7
Efficacy and safety of miconazole for oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.咪康唑治疗口腔念珠菌病的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Oral Dis. 2016 Apr;22(3):185-95. doi: 10.1111/odi.12380. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
8
[Near asphyxiation of a neonate due to miconazole oral gel].[咪康唑口腔凝胶致新生儿近乎窒息]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Aug 7;148(32):1598-600.
9
Comparison of ketoconazole suspension and nystatin in the treatment of newborns and infants with oral candidosis.
Mycoses. 1989 Jun;32(6):312-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1989.tb02250.x.
10
Miconazole chewing gum for treatment of chronic oral candidosis.用于治疗慢性口腔念珠菌病的咪康唑口香糖
Scand J Dent Res. 1993 Dec;101(6):386-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01137.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nystatin Effectiveness in Oral Candidiasis Treatment: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.制霉菌素治疗口腔念珠菌病的有效性:一项临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 22;12(11):1677. doi: 10.3390/life12111677.
2
Candidiasis (oropharyngeal).念珠菌病(口咽型)
BMJ Clin Evid. 2013 Nov 8;2013:1304.
3
Candidiasis (oropharyngeal).念珠菌病(口咽)

本文引用的文献

1
Diaper dermatitis.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1956 Aug:759-70. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)30407-2.
2
Rapid identification of Candida albicans by using Albicans ID and fluoroplate agar plates.使用白色念珠菌鉴定试剂盒和荧光平板琼脂平板快速鉴定白色念珠菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):3034-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.3034-3036.1994.
3
Oral thrush in children treated with miconazole gel.接受咪康唑凝胶治疗的儿童口腔念珠菌病
Mykosen. 1980 Feb;23(2):75-8.
BMJ Clin Evid. 2012 Feb 20;2012:1304.
4
Candidiasis (oropharyngeal).念珠菌病(口咽)
BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 18;2009:1304.
4
[Prospective comparison of miconazole gel and nystatin suspension in the treatment of oral candidiasis].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1983 Sep 24;113(38):1356-62.
5
Treatment and prevention of oropharyngeal candidiasis.
Am J Med. 1984 Oct 30;77(4D):44-8.
6
Miconazole, a broad-spectrum antimycotic agent with antibacterial activity.咪康唑,一种具有抗菌活性的广谱抗真菌剂。
Chemotherapy. 1972;17(6):392-404. doi: 10.1159/000220875.
7
Candidosis of the oral cavity. Recognition and management.口腔念珠菌病。识别与处理。
Drugs. 1988 Nov;36(5):633-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198836050-00006.
8
Prophylactic miconazole oral gel for the prevention of neonatal fungal rectal colonization and systemic infection.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Sep;11(9):713-6. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199209000-00008.
9
Oral candidosis: treatment with absorbable and non-absorbable antifungal agents in children.口腔念珠菌病:儿童使用可吸收和不可吸收抗真菌剂的治疗
Mycoses. 1992 Jan-Feb;35(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1992.tb00812.x.