Shanson D C, Hince C
J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jun;30(6):521-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.521.
We have compared the results of gentamicin assay of 100 clinical serum samples by a rapid 40 degrees C plate diffusion method, an overnight plate assay at 37 degrees C, and radioactive acetyltransferase methods. The results of assay obtained by both plate diffusion methods agreed closely. There was excellent correlation between the results of acetyltransferase and plate assays provided that human serum gentamicin standards were used for the acetyltransferase assay and turbid sera were excluded. Lipaemic sera were associated with falsely high results by the acetyltransferase method. There was no difference in specificity between the methods when antibiotics other than gentamicin were present. Much less skilled technician time was required to perform the rapid 40 degrees C plate method than the radioactive acetyltransferase method. The 40 degrees C plate method is preferred for routine serum gentamicin assays in our clinical laboratories.
我们通过快速40℃平板扩散法、37℃过夜平板分析法以及放射性乙酰转移酶法,对100份临床血清样本的庆大霉素检测结果进行了比较。两种平板扩散法所获得的检测结果非常接近。如果在乙酰转移酶检测中使用人血清庆大霉素标准品并排除浑浊血清,那么乙酰转移酶法和平板分析法的结果之间存在极佳的相关性。高脂血症血清会导致乙酰转移酶法得出错误的高结果。当存在庆大霉素以外的抗生素时,这些方法之间的特异性没有差异。与放射性乙酰转移酶法相比,采用快速40℃平板法所需的技术人员时间要少得多。在我们的临床实验室中,40℃平板法更适合用于常规血清庆大霉素检测。