Siemiatycki J
Institut Armand-Frappier, Universite du Quebec, Laval, Canada.
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Nov;103 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):209-15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s8209.
Research focused on occupational exposure has been one of the cornerstones of epidemiological research into the etiology of cancer. It is appropriate to critically assess the contribution of this research effort and to assess the potential for making significant progress in the future in unraveling the etiology of cancer by studying the occupational environment. The study of the occupational environment has indeed been very fruitful. It is likely that there remain many more carcinogens to be discovered, but we have not deployed adequately sensitive study methods. The two major obstacles to quality research have been inadequate exposure assessment and insufficient sample sizes. Quality exposure assessment requires the participation of trained experts (industrial hygienists, chemists, etc.); it also requires an adequate information base on the exposures that occur in different workplaces. We need structures and career paths that facilitate the participation of exposure experts in epidemiological research. We need active large-scale industrial hygiene surveys to better characterize the U.S. workplace. This will be useful for epidemiological studies and for public health purposes. Community-based case-control studies will need to be much larger than they have been traditionally, with 1000 as a minimum number of cases and controls.
专注于职业暴露的研究一直是癌症病因流行病学研究的基石之一。批判性地评估这项研究工作的贡献,并评估未来通过研究职业环境在揭示癌症病因方面取得重大进展的潜力,是恰当的。对职业环境的研究确实成果丰硕。很可能还有更多致癌物有待发现,但我们尚未采用足够灵敏的研究方法。高质量研究的两大障碍一直是暴露评估不足和样本量不够。高质量的暴露评估需要训练有素的专家(工业卫生学家、化学家等)参与;还需要有关于不同工作场所暴露情况的充分信息基础。我们需要有利于暴露专家参与流行病学研究的架构和职业发展路径。我们需要开展积极的大规模工业卫生调查,以便更好地描述美国工作场所的情况。这将有助于流行病学研究和公共卫生目的。基于社区的病例对照研究规模需要比以往大得多,病例和对照的最少数量为1000例。