• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与糖尿病中心治疗与糖尿病患者5年生存率提高相关:维罗纳糖尿病研究。

Attending the diabetes center is associated with increased 5-year survival probability of diabetic patients: the Verona Diabetes Study.

作者信息

Verlato G, Muggeo M, Bonora E, Corbellini M, Bressan F, de Marco R

机构信息

Division of Metabolic Diseases, University of Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1996 Mar;19(3):211-3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.3.211.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.19.3.211
PMID:8742563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to compare the survival of patients attending diabetes centers with that of patients exclusively consulting family physicians.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was carried out in the frame of the Verona Diabetes Study, a population-based survey of known diabetes prevalence with a subsequent 5-year mortality follow-up. A cohort of 7,488 diabetic patients were identified on 31 December 1986 from three different sources: a drug consumption database, family physicians, and diabetes centers (one for children and one for adults). As of 31 December 1986, 3,288 patients in the entire cohort exclusively consulted their own family physicians, while 4,200 patients also had periodic examinations at the diabetes centers. The life status of the diabetic cohort was ascertained on 31 December 1991.

RESULTS

Compared with the nondiabetic population, diabetic patients seen only by family physicians had a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.62 (95% CI 1.51-1.74), while patients attending both family physicians and diabetes centers showed an SMR of 1.44 (1.34-1.54), the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.017). The 5-year survival probability, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, was 0.76 (0.75-0.78) in patients seen only by family physicians and 0.81 (0.80-0.82) in patients attending the diabetes centers. Multivariate analysis by Cox regression model showed that attending the diabetes centers was an independent predictor of survival even after adjusting for sex, age, and therapy of diabetes. The relative risk of 5-year all-cause mortality amounted to 0.83 (0.75-0.92) in patients also attending the diabetes centers with respect to patients consulting only family physicians (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data on patients' survival indicate that diabetes centers play a crucial role in diabetes care. As a corollary, an integration between primary-care physicians and diabetes centers is strongly recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较就诊于糖尿病中心的患者与仅咨询家庭医生的患者的生存率。

研究设计与方法

本研究是在维罗纳糖尿病研究的框架内进行的,这是一项基于人群的已知糖尿病患病率调查,并随后进行了5年的死亡率随访。1986年12月31日,从三个不同来源确定了一组7488名糖尿病患者:一个药物消费数据库、家庭医生和糖尿病中心(一个儿童糖尿病中心和一个成人糖尿病中心)。截至1986年12月31日,整个队列中有3288名患者仅咨询自己的家庭医生,而4200名患者还在糖尿病中心进行定期检查。1991年12月31日确定了糖尿病队列的生命状态。

结果

与非糖尿病人群相比,仅由家庭医生诊治的糖尿病患者的标准化死亡率(SMR)为1.62(95%CI 1.51 - 1.74),而同时就诊于家庭医生和糖尿病中心的患者的SMR为1.44(1.34 - 1.54),差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.017)。通过Kaplan-Meier方法估计,仅由家庭医生诊治的患者的5年生存概率为0.76(0.75 - 0.78),而就诊于糖尿病中心的患者为0.81(0.80 - 0.82)。Cox回归模型的多变量分析表明,即使在调整了性别、年龄和糖尿病治疗后,就诊于糖尿病中心仍是生存的独立预测因素。与仅咨询家庭医生的患者相比,同时就诊于糖尿病中心的患者5年全因死亡率的相对风险为0.83(0.75 - 0.92)(P < 0.001)。

结论

这些关于患者生存的数据表明,糖尿病中心在糖尿病护理中起着至关重要的作用。作为必然结果,强烈建议基层医疗医生与糖尿病中心之间进行整合。

相似文献

1
Attending the diabetes center is associated with increased 5-year survival probability of diabetic patients: the Verona Diabetes Study.参与糖尿病中心治疗与糖尿病患者5年生存率提高相关:维罗纳糖尿病研究。
Diabetes Care. 1996 Mar;19(3):211-3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.3.211.
2
The Verona diabetes study: a population-based survey on known diabetes mellitus prevalence and 5-year all-cause mortality.维罗纳糖尿病研究:一项基于人群的已知糖尿病患病率及5年全因死亡率调查。
Diabetologia. 1995 Mar;38(3):318-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00400637.
3
All-cause mortality in the Canterbury (New Zealand) insulin-treated Diabetic Registry population.新西兰坎特伯雷胰岛素治疗糖尿病登记人群的全因死亡率。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jan;24(1):56-63. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.1.56.
4
A population-based prevalence survey of known diabetes mellitus in northern Italy based upon multiple independent sources of ascertainment.一项基于多种独立确诊来源的意大利北部已知糖尿病的人群患病率调查。
Diabetologia. 1992 Sep;35(9):851-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00399931.
5
Diabetes duration and cause-specific mortality in the Verona Diabetes Study.维罗纳糖尿病研究中的糖尿病病程与特定病因死亡率
Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug;23(8):1119-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1119.
6
Diabetes as a predictor of mortality in a cohort of blind subjects.
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;25(5):1038-43. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.5.1038.
7
Attending the diabetes center is associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetic patients: the Verona Diabetes Study.参与糖尿病中心治疗与2型糖尿病患者心血管死亡率降低相关:维罗纳糖尿病研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999 May-Jun;15(3):170-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-7560(199905/06)15:3<170::aid-dmrr39>3.0.co;2-y.
8
Mortality in adults with and without diabetes in a national cohort of the U.S. population, 1971-1993.1971 - 1993年美国全国人群队列中患糖尿病和未患糖尿病成年人的死亡率
Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1138-45. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1138.
9
Capture-recapture method in the epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: a contribution from the Verona Diabetes Study.2型糖尿病流行病学中的捕获-再捕获方法:来自维罗纳糖尿病研究的贡献。
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jun;23(6):759-64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.6.759.
10
A prevalence study of known diabetes mellitus in Tuscany assessed from pharmaceutical prescriptions and other independent sources.一项基于药品处方及其他独立来源评估托斯卡纳已知糖尿病患病率的研究。
Acta Diabetol. 1994 Jun;31(2):87-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00570541.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the sexual health of couples with diabetes: study protocol of an action research study.改善糖尿病夫妻的性健康:一项行动研究的研究方案
Reprod Health. 2025 Feb 12;22(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-01964-9.
2
Association of technologically assisted integrated care with clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes in Hong Kong using the prospective JADE Program: A retrospective cohort analysis.利用前瞻性 JADE 计划评估香港 2 型糖尿病患者接受技术辅助综合护理与临床结局的相关性:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 2;17(10):e1003367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003367. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Diabetes Care: A Position Statement of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists.
糖尿病护理中的人工智能与大数据:意大利医学糖尿病专家协会立场声明
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 22;22(6):e16922. doi: 10.2196/16922.
4
Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with diabetes and hypertension: experience of a Brazilian center.糖尿病和高血压患者的多学科治疗:巴西一家中心的经验。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018 Jan 8;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0305-2. eCollection 2018.
5
Do diabetes-specialty clinics differ in management approach and outcome? A cross-sectional assessment of ambulatory type 2 diabetes patients in two teaching hospitals in Nigeria.糖尿病专科诊所的管理方法和治疗结果是否存在差异?对尼日利亚两家教学医院的门诊2型糖尿病患者进行的横断面评估。
Ghana Med J. 2016 Jun;50(2):90-102. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i2.7.
6
Taking Telemedicine to the Next Level in Diabetes Population Management: a Review of the Endo ECHO Model.提升糖尿病群体管理中的远程医疗水平:内分泌科电子会诊(Endo ECHO)模式综述
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Oct;16(10):96. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0784-9.
7
IMPROVEMENTS IN METABOLIC CONTROL IN ADULTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES FOLLOWING REFERRAL TO A DIABETES CENTER, 2005-2010.2005 - 2010年转诊至糖尿病中心的2型糖尿病成人患者代谢控制情况的改善
Endocr Pract. 2016 Jun;22(6):689-98. doi: 10.4158/EP151080.OR. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
8
Differences in the structure of outpatient diabetes care between endocrinologist-led and general physician-led services.内分泌科医生主导和全科医生主导的门诊糖尿病护理结构差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 25;13:493. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-493.
9
The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.筛查指南的遵循情况以及糖尿病诊所的转诊对糖尿病患者的发病率和死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033839. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practice of type 2 diabetes among patients of Saurashtra region, Gujarat.评估古吉拉特邦索拉什特拉地区2型糖尿病患者的知识、态度和行为。
Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2009 Jul;29(3):118-22. doi: 10.4103/0973-3930.54288.