Elahi D
Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center/Baltimore, University of Maryland School of Medicine 21201-1524, USA.
Diabetes Care. 1996 Mar;19(3):278-86. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.3.278.
The most widely used methods for the assessment of beta-cell response and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin include the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, and the hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic clamp technique. During an OGTT, glucose levels increase after a variable lag period, then reach a peak and fall variably among individuals. The response even varies in the same subject upon repeat testing. A more reproducible glucose curve is achieved with an intravenous glucose tolerance test in which the plasma glucose levels rise rapidly to a very high level and fall exponentially. In neither of the two methods is a steady-state glucose level achieved. In the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique, a steady-state glucose level can be maintained at any level of hyperinsulinemia. However, an assessment of beta-cell sensitivity is not obtained. The less used hyperglycemic clamp technique can assess beta-cell sensitivity as well as peripheral tissue sensitivity. Moreover, a measure of glucose effectiveness or non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake can also be determined. With this technique the beta-cells of all subjects are stimulated with the same arterial glucose concentration, thus enabling assessment of beta-cell response to identical plasma glucose levels. Comparison of responses to stable hyperglycemic stimuli can be made in glucose-tolerant and -intolerant states with the addition of various substances, either alone or in combination. The use of the hyperglycemic clamp and several of its variant forms is reviewed as an alternative method for assessment of glucose homeostasis.
评估β细胞反应和外周组织对胰岛素敏感性的最广泛使用的方法包括口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)、频繁采样静脉葡萄糖耐量试验和高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹技术。在OGTT期间,葡萄糖水平在一段可变的延迟期后升高,然后达到峰值,并在个体之间有不同程度的下降。即使在同一受试者重复测试时,反应也会有所不同。静脉葡萄糖耐量试验能获得更具重复性的葡萄糖曲线,在该试验中,血浆葡萄糖水平迅速上升至非常高的水平,然后呈指数下降。这两种方法都无法达到稳态葡萄糖水平。在高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹技术中,可以在任何高胰岛素血症水平维持稳态葡萄糖水平。然而,无法获得β细胞敏感性的评估结果。较少使用的高血糖钳夹技术可以评估β细胞敏感性以及外周组织敏感性。此外,还可以确定葡萄糖有效性或非胰岛素介导的葡萄糖摄取的指标。使用该技术时,所有受试者的β细胞都受到相同动脉葡萄糖浓度的刺激,从而能够评估β细胞对相同血浆葡萄糖水平的反应。通过添加各种物质单独或联合使用,可以在糖耐量正常和糖耐量异常状态下比较对稳定高血糖刺激的反应。本文综述了高血糖钳夹及其几种变体形式作为评估葡萄糖稳态的替代方法的应用。