• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术:720例患者中与开腹阑尾切除术的比较

Laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients.

作者信息

Richards K F, Fisher K S, Flores J H, Christensen B J

机构信息

Intermountain Endosurgical Institute, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Jun;6(3):205-9.

PMID:8743364
Abstract

We conducted a review of laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) and open appendectomies (OA) over a 3-year period, including 720 patients (253 LA, 467 OA) who underwent appendectomy during the study period. Computer records were reviewed with respect to demographics, length of stay, operating room time, operating room cost, hospital cost, and morbidity. All patients were sent surveys to assess their posthospitalization recovery. The LA patients had significant shorter hospital stays (2.06 days vs. 3.44 days, p < .001), lower morbidity rates (5 vs 14%, p < .02), and comparable overall hospital costs ($4,800 vs. $4,950). The LA patients also reported less postoperative pain and were able to return to work sooner. Our results show that LA can significantly decrease morbidity and hospital stay with a comparable hospital cost and result in quicker patient recovery.

摘要

我们对3年期间的腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)和开腹阑尾切除术(OA)进行了回顾,研究期间共有720例患者接受了阑尾切除术(253例LA,467例OA)。我们查阅了计算机记录,内容涉及人口统计学信息、住院时间、手术室时间、手术室费用、医院费用和发病率。所有患者均收到调查问卷,以评估他们出院后的恢复情况。LA患者的住院时间明显更短(2.06天对3.44天,p <.001),发病率更低(5%对14%,p <.02),总体医院费用相当(4800美元对4950美元)。LA患者术后疼痛也较轻,能够更快恢复工作。我们的结果表明,LA可以显著降低发病率和缩短住院时间,同时医院费用相当,并能使患者更快康复。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:720例患者中与开腹阑尾切除术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Jun;6(3):205-9.
2
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in West Bengal, India.印度西孟加拉邦的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比
Chin J Dig Dis. 2005;6(4):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00225.x.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
5
A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究:临床与经济学分析。
Surgery. 2001 Apr;129(4):390-400. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.114216.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is there really any benefit?腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:真的有任何益处吗?
Am Surg. 1993 Aug;59(8):541-7; discussion 547-8.
7
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.
9
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.老年患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的优势。
Am Surg. 2006 Jun;72(6):474-80.
10
Benefits of laparoscopy in middle-aged patients.腹腔镜检查对中年患者的益处。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):68-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8823-9. Epub 2002 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of intra-abdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性和非复杂性阑尾炎后腹腔内脓肿形成的比较:一项回顾性研究
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):560-565. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.103942. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
A modified Delphi method toward multidisciplinary consensus on functional convalescence recommendations after abdominal surgery.一种用于就腹部手术后功能康复建议达成多学科共识的改良德尔菲法。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5583-5595. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4931-9. Epub 2016 May 2.
3
Laparoscopic management of appendicular mass.
阑尾周围脓肿的腹腔镜治疗
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Apr;7(2):136-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.78345.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with lower morbidity in extremely obese children.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与极度肥胖儿童较低的发病率相关。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 May;27(5):533-6. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2825-9.
5
[Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth the cost?].[腹腔镜阑尾切除术:是否物有所值?]
Chirurg. 2009 Oct;80(10):966-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1746-4.
6
The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery.机械主从操纵器:一种提高内镜手术标准化任务操作性能的器械。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):1025-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9038-2. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy is a favorable alternative for complicated appendicitis in children.腹腔镜阑尾切除术是治疗儿童复杂性阑尾炎的一种理想选择。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Mar;23(3):257-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1833-2. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
8
Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children.开放阑尾切除术和腹腔镜阑尾切除术在儿童中同样安全且可接受。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):242-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8140-y. Epub 2003 Dec 29.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:真正的差异是什么?一项前瞻性随机双盲试验的结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):334-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8927-x. Epub 2003 Dec 29.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:基于大型管理数据库的结局比较
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1.