McDonald S F, Hamilton S J, Buhl K J, Heisinger J F
Midwest Science Center, US National Biological Service, Yankton, South Dakota 57078, USA.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1996 Feb;33(1):62-72. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1996.0007.
Acute toxicity tests were conducted exposing Daphnia magna Straus (daphnid) in soft and hard reconstituted waters (hardness 42 and 162 mg/liter as CaCO3, respectively), and Selenastrum capricornutum Printz (algae) in ASTM algal assay medium (hardness 15 mg/liter as CaCO3) to fire retardants Fire-Trol GTS-R, Fire-Trol LCG-R, and Phos-Chek D75-F, and foam suppressants Phos-Check WD-881 and Silv-Ex. The chemicals were slightly toxic to practically harmless to daphnids and moderately toxic to algae. Water quality did not consistently alter the toxicity of the test chemicals to daphnids. The most toxic chemical to daphnids was Silv-Ex (48-hr EC50 7 mg/liter in soft and hard waters), whereas the least toxic chemical to daphnids was Fire-Trol LCG-R (48-hr EC50 848 mg/liter in soft water, 813 mg/liter in hard water). The most toxic chemical to algae was Fire-Trol LCG-R (96-hr IC50 10 mg/liter), and the least toxic chemical was Phos-Chek D75-F (96-hr IC50 79 mg/liter). Un-ionized ammonia concentrations near the EC50 or IC50 value in tests with the Fire-Trol compounds were frequently equal to or above reported LC50 un-ionized ammonia concentrations. Un-ionized ammonia concentrations in tests with Phos-Chek D75-F were low, thus other toxic components present in the compounds probably contributed to the toxicity. When compared to the daphnids tested in ASTM soft water, the Fire-Trol compounds were most toxic to algae, whereas Phos-Chek D75-F and the foam suppressants were most toxic to daphnids. The results of these tests are comparable to those obtained from research conducted in other laboratories with the same species and similar chemicals. Accidental entry of fire-fighting chemicals into aquatic environments could adversely affect algae and aquatic invertebrates, thus disrupting ecosystem function.
进行了急性毒性试验,将大型溞(水蚤)暴露于软质和硬质人工配制水中(硬度分别为42和162毫克/升碳酸钙),将羊角月牙藻暴露于ASTM藻类试验培养基中(硬度为15毫克/升碳酸钙),使其接触阻燃剂Fire-Trol GTS-R、Fire-Trol LCG-R和Phos-Chek D75-F,以及泡沫抑制剂Phos-Chek WD-881和Silv-Ex。这些化学品对水蚤的毒性为微毒至实际无害,对藻类为中等毒性。水质并未始终改变试验化学品对水蚤的毒性。对水蚤毒性最大的化学品是Silv-Ex(在软水和硬水中48小时半数有效浓度为7毫克/升),而对水蚤毒性最小的化学品是Fire-Trol LCG-R(在软水中48小时半数有效浓度为848毫克/升,在硬水中为813毫克/升)。对藻类毒性最大的化学品是Fire-Trol LCG-R(96小时半数抑制浓度为10毫克/升),毒性最小的化学品是Phos-Chek D75-F(96小时半数抑制浓度为79毫克/升)。在使用Fire-Trol化合物的试验中,接近半数有效浓度或半数抑制浓度时的非离子氨浓度经常等于或高于报告的非离子氨半数致死浓度。在使用Phos-Chek D75-F的试验中,非离子氨浓度较低,因此该化合物中存在的其他有毒成分可能导致了毒性。与在ASTM软水中测试的水蚤相比,Fire-Trol化合物对藻类毒性最大,而Phos-Chek D75-F和泡沫抑制剂对水蚤毒性最大。这些试验结果与其他实验室使用相同物种和类似化学品进行的研究结果相当。消防化学品意外进入水生环境可能会对藻类和水生无脊椎动物产生不利影响,从而破坏生态系统功能。