Scott A, Shiell A, King M
Health Economics Research Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jan;42(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00063-1.
This paper presents a preliminary exploration into the relationship between decisions made by general practitioners (GPs) and the socio-economic status (SES) of patients. There is a large literature on the association between SES, health state and the use of health services, but relatively little has been published on the association between SES and decisions by clinicians once a patient is in the health system. The associations between GP decision making and the patient's SES, health status, gender and insurance status are examined using logit analysis. Three sets of binary choices are analysed: the decision to follow up; to prescribe; and to perform or to order a diagnostic test. Secondary data on consultations for a check up/examination were used to explore these relationships. The results suggest that SES is associated independently with the decision to test and the decision to prescribe but not with the decision to follow up. Patients of high SES are, ceteris paribus, more likely to be tested and less likely to receive a prescription compared with patients of low SES. Women are more likely to be tested and to receive a prescription than men. These findings have implications for the pursuit of equity as a goal of health services policy.
本文对全科医生(GP)所做决策与患者社会经济地位(SES)之间的关系进行了初步探索。关于SES、健康状况与医疗服务利用之间的关联,已有大量文献,但对于患者进入医疗系统后,SES与临床医生决策之间的关联,相关研究相对较少。运用逻辑分析方法,考察了全科医生决策与患者SES、健康状况、性别及保险状况之间的关联。分析了三组二元选择:跟进决策、开药决策以及进行或安排诊断检测的决策。利用关于体检/检查会诊的二手数据来探究这些关系。结果表明,SES与检测决策和开药决策独立相关,但与跟进决策无关。在其他条件相同的情况下,与低SES患者相比,高SES患者接受检测的可能性更大,而接受开药的可能性更小。女性比男性更有可能接受检测和开药。这些发现对将公平作为医疗服务政策目标的追求具有启示意义。