Suppr超能文献

常规体外受精和透明带下显微授精衍生胚胎的比较分析。

A comparative analysis of embryos derived from routine in-vitro fertilization and subzonal microinsemination.

作者信息

Imoedemhe D A, Sigue A B, Pacpaco E L, Olazo A B, Luciano E C

机构信息

Human Reproductive Biology Unit, Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1995 Nov;10(11):2970-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135832.

Abstract

Embryos obtained from patients undergoing routine in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer were compared with those undergoing subzonal microinsemination (SUZI) for male factor infertility. Overall, the proportion of cleaved embryos was significantly higher in the IVF group in comparison with the SUZI group at 48 h post-insemination [1533 out of 1609 (95.3%) versus 776 out of 952 (81.5%)]. The mean +/- SD grading score of the IVF-derived embryos of 3.61 +/- 0.50 was significantly better than that for SUZI of 2.97 +/- 0.86 (P < 0.0005) at the same time. The implantation rates following the replacement of IVF or SUZI embryos at 48 h were comparable: 14.3 and 10.0% respectively. However, the IVF embryo implantation rate of 15.1% at 72 h was significantly better than that following the replacement of SUZI embryos at either 48 (10.0%) or 72 h (8.0%). The replacement of SUZI-derived embryos at 48 h resulted in significantly higher pregnancy (25.0%) and implantation rates (10.0%) than at 72 h, with rates of 10.8 and 8.0% respectively. Similarly, the overall embryo quality deteriorated following in-vitro culture for up to 72 h. The clinical pregnancy loss rate (33.0%) was highest following the replacement of SUZI embryos at 72 h, although the data were limited. It is suggested that these data indicate that a combination of in-vitro manipulation, the injection of multiple spermatozoa into the subzonal space and probably the genomic capacity of spermatozoa derived from poor-quality semen may contribute to the poorer outcome of embryo development following SUZI. Prolonged in-vitro culture beyond 48 h appears to be deleterious to the development of SUZI cleaved embryos and the subsequent outcome of treatment, and hence should be avoided.

摘要

将接受常规体外受精(IVF)和胚胎移植患者所获得的胚胎,与因男性因素不育而接受透明带下显微授精(SUZI)的患者的胚胎进行比较。总体而言,授精后48小时,IVF组的分裂胚比例显著高于SUZI组[1609个中有1533个(95.3%),而952个中有776个(81.5%)]。同时,IVF来源胚胎的平均±标准差分级评分3.61±0.50显著优于SUZI来源胚胎的2.97±0.86(P<0.0005)。48小时时移植IVF或SUZI胚胎后的着床率相当:分别为14.3%和10.0%。然而,72小时时IVF胚胎的着床率为15.1%,显著优于48小时(10.0%)或72小时(8.0%)时移植SUZI胚胎后的着床率。48小时时移植SUZI来源胚胎后的妊娠率(25.0%)和着床率(10.0%)显著高于72小时时,72小时时的妊娠率和着床率分别为10.8%和8.0%。同样,体外培养长达72小时后,胚胎总体质量下降。尽管数据有限,但72小时时移植SUZI胚胎后的临床妊娠丢失率最高(33.0%)。提示这些数据表明,体外操作、向透明带下空间注射多个精子以及可能来自劣质精液的精子的基因组能力的综合作用,可能导致SUZI后胚胎发育结果较差。体外培养超过48小时似乎对SUZI分裂胚的发育和后续治疗结果有害,因此应避免。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验