Levy M L, McComb J G
Division of Neurological Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, USA.
Neurosurgery. 1996 Jan;38(1):211-5; discussion 215-6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199601000-00050.
Children with atlantoaxial instability and subluxation that will not reduce with extension of the cervical spine often present with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of spinal cord compression at the C1-C2 level. If the patient requires a laminectomy at the C1 level, occipital fusion is necessitated with associated reduction in mobility and high incidence of nonunion, as compared with a C1-C2 fusion. Also, passing wires under the intact lamina at C1 can further compromise an already compressed cervical cord. To address the problems associated with either of the above options, we used a C1-C2 fusion with removal of the mid 2 cm of the lamina of C1. Another option is the application of a transarticular screw fixation of C1-C2, which does not require the posterior element of C1. The current study was performed before the introduction of this type of fixation. Over a 10-year period, we have used the described technique to treat 13 patients. After decompression and fusion at the C1 and C2 levels as described, all patients had resolution of their preoperative neurological symptoms and all have achieved a stable fusion. Partial removal of the lamina at C1 and then C1-C2 fusion are safe and effective procedures to treat children with atlantoaxial instability and spinal cord compression.
寰枢椎不稳和半脱位且颈椎伸展时不能复位的儿童,常伴有C1 - C2水平脊髓受压的临床和/或影像学证据。如果患者需要在C1水平行椎板切除术,与C1 - C2融合相比,枕颈融合术必然会导致活动度降低且不愈合发生率高。此外,在C1完整的椎板下穿过钢丝会进一步损害已经受压的颈髓。为解决上述任一方案相关的问题,我们采用了C1 - C2融合并切除C1椎板中间2 cm的方法。另一种选择是应用C1 - C2经关节螺钉固定,该方法不需要C1的后部结构。本研究是在引入这种固定方法之前进行的。在10年期间,我们采用上述技术治疗了13例患者。按所述在C1和C2水平进行减压和融合后,所有患者术前的神经症状均得到缓解,且均实现了稳定融合。部分切除C1椎板然后行C1 - C2融合是治疗寰枢椎不稳和脊髓受压儿童的安全有效的方法。