• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Electroejaculation in patients with spinal cord injury: first report of a large-scale experience from Japan.

作者信息

Momose H, Hirao Y, Yamamoto M, Yamada K, Okajima E

机构信息

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 1995 Nov;2(5):326-9.

PMID:8749952
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ejaculatory dysfunction is a substantial obstacle for spinal cord-injured men who have a desire to father their own children. Electroejaculation can potentially solve this problem. Recently, Halsted et al. reported outstanding results of the rectal probe electrostimulation (RPE) using newly developed equipment (Seager Model). In this paper, we report the first large-scale clinical trial in Japan of RPE for spinal cord-injured men.

METHODS

RPE using the Seager Model was attempted on 328 occasions in 53 patients with an age range of 19-47 years; 1-38 years had elapsed since injury.

RESULTS

Antegrade ejaculation was obtained in 46 patients (86.8%). Ninety-three percent of patients with upper motor neuron lesion-type neurogenic bladder produced antegrade ejaculation by RPE, whereas the rate in patients with lower motor neuron lesion type one was 63.6% (P < 0.05). Semen analyses revealed affected sperm motility rate as low as 17.2%. Artificial insemination from these husbands (AIH) was attempted on 54 occasions in 11 wives of the patients. On April 2, 1992, we had the first recorded birth in Japan with the assistance of RPE and AIH. On July 21, 1993, we had another successful birth.

CONCLUSIONS

These promising results will encourage Japanese researchers to use electro-ejaculation, although the low success rate in patients with lower motor neuron lesion-type neurogenic bladder and the low motility of the sperm are obstacles to be overcome.

摘要

相似文献

1
Electroejaculation in patients with spinal cord injury: first report of a large-scale experience from Japan.
Int J Urol. 1995 Nov;2(5):326-9.
2
[The spinal cord injured patient: semen quality and management by Assisted Reproductive Technology].[脊髓损伤患者:精液质量与辅助生殖技术管理]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Sep;38(9):532-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
3
Vibratory stimulation and rectal probe electroejaculation as therapy for patients with spinal cord injury: semen parameters and pregnancy rates.振动刺激和直肠探头电射精治疗脊髓损伤患者:精液参数和妊娠率
J Urol. 1996 Feb;155(2):554-9.
4
[Electroejaculation and assisted reproductive techniques in the patients with spinal cord injury].[脊髓损伤患者的电射精与辅助生殖技术]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1997 Mar;88(3):420-6. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.88.420.
5
Treatment of anejaculation with electroejaculation.用电刺激射精治疗不射精症。
Acta Urol Belg. 1992;60(3):15-25.
6
[Clinical results of infertility treatment to male patients with spinal cord injury].[脊髓损伤男性患者不育治疗的临床结果]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2004 Jan;50(1):21-3.
7
Rectal probe electrostimulation in the treatment of anejaculatory spinal cord injured men.
Paraplegia. 1987 Apr;25(2):120-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.1987.21.
8
Comparison of three sperm retrieval techniques in spinal cord-injured men: pregnancy outcome.脊髓损伤男性三种取精技术的比较:妊娠结局
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 May;22(5):252-5. doi: 10.1080/09513590600647326.
9
Electroejaculation versus vibratory stimulation in spinal cord injured men: sperm quality and patient preference.脊髓损伤男性的电射精与振动刺激:精子质量及患者偏好
J Urol. 1997 Jun;157(6):2147-9.
10
Semen quality of spinal cord injured men is better when obtained by vibratory stimulation versus electroejaculation.与电射精相比,脊髓损伤男性通过振动刺激获取精液时,精液质量更好。
J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):151-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical review of ejaculatory dysfunction.射精功能障碍的临床综述
Reprod Med Biol. 2019 Jul 24;18(4):331-343. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12289. eCollection 2019 Oct.