Waldenberger F, Kim Y I, Laycock S, Meyns B, Flameng W
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Aug;112(2):484-93. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70276-3.
This experimental study was designed to assess the influence of failure of the right side of the heart or pulmonary hypertension, or both, on the performance of a novel miniaturized left ventricular assist device. In small-sized dogs (n = 50) ischemic global left ventricular failure was induced and support was provided by the HIA-VAD displacement pump (stroke volume 10 or 25 ml) installed as a left ventricular assist device. In three groups of animals (n = 10 each) pulmonary hypertension was created before induction of global left ventricular failure. During left ventricular assist device support temporary ischemic failure of the right side of the heart was induced in four groups of animals (n = 10 each). In the group subjected to left ventricular failure, support with the left ventricular assist device, and right ventricular failure during left ventricular assist, left atrial pressure and cardiac index were significantly lower than in the group subjected to left ventricular failure and left ventricular assist alone (2 +/- 6 versus 11 +/- 6 mm Hg and 1.6 +/- 0.4 versus 1.0 +/- 0.4 L/(min/m2), respectively, p < 0.05). In the group subjected to pulmonary hypertension, left ventricular failure, and left ventricular support, left atrial pressure dropped to values near zero but cardiac index remained unaltered as compared with results with the same regimen without pulmonary hypertension. However, when right ventricular failure was added (that is, pulmonary hypertension, left ventricular failure, left ventricular support, and right ventricular failure during support with the left ventricular assist device) left atrial pressure dropped to negative values (p < 0.05) and cardiac index progressively deteriorated. When, in an additional group of dogs, biventricular support was installed in the latter regimen, circulation was initially well supported but oxygenation deteriorated in 60% of cases. We conclude that (1) adequate right ventricular function was indispensable during support with the left ventricular assist device, (2) the combination of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure led to the "low left ventricular assist device output syndrome," and (3) biventricular mechanical support in the presence of pulmonary hypertension may be complicated by the alveolar leakage syndrome.
本实验研究旨在评估右心衰竭或肺动脉高压或两者同时存在对一种新型小型左心室辅助装置性能的影响。在小型犬(n = 50)中诱导缺血性全心左心室衰竭,并通过作为左心室辅助装置安装的HIA-VAD置换泵(每搏量10或25 ml)提供支持。在三组动物(每组n = 10)中,在诱导全心左心室衰竭之前造成肺动脉高压。在左心室辅助装置支持期间,在四组动物(每组n = 10)中诱导右心暂时缺血性衰竭。在接受左心室衰竭、左心室辅助装置支持以及左心室辅助期间右心室衰竭的组中,左心房压力和心脏指数显著低于仅接受左心室衰竭和左心室辅助的组(分别为2±6与11±6 mmHg以及1.6±0.4与1.0±0.4 L/(min/m²),p < 0.05)。在接受肺动脉高压、左心室衰竭和左心室支持的组中,左心房压力降至接近零的值,但与无肺动脉高压的相同方案相比,心脏指数保持不变。然而,当增加右心室衰竭时(即肺动脉高压、左心室衰竭、左心室支持以及左心室辅助装置支持期间右心室衰竭),左心房压力降至负值(p < 0.05),心脏指数逐渐恶化。在另一组犬中,在上述方案中安装双心室支持时,循环最初得到良好支持,但60%的病例出现氧合恶化。我们得出结论:(1)在左心室辅助装置支持期间,足够的右心室功能不可或缺;(2)肺动脉高压和右心室衰竭的组合导致“低左心室辅助装置输出综合征”;(3)存在肺动脉高压时双心室机械支持可能并发肺泡渗漏综合征。