McCusker J, Stoddard A, Frost R, Zorn M
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Aug;184(8):482-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199608000-00005.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the associations of planned versus actual duration of drug abuse treatment with psychosocial outcomes and drug use at follow-up. A randomized trial was conducted in a modified therapeutic community in which 444 clients were assigned to programs with planned durations of either 3 or 6 months. Outcomes were psychosocial measures assessing changes in mood and in stage of behavior change between admission and exit and return to drug use and patterns of use 2 to 6 months after exit. Planned duration was not associated with any of the outcomes. A longer actual length of stay was, however, associated with greater improvements in the mood variables; lower rates of drug use at follow-up; and, among those using drugs at follow-up, a longer time from exit to first drug use. Intention-to-treat analyses supported these results. Randomized controlled trials are needed to distinguish the effects of planned duration and actual length of stay.
本研究的目的是评估药物滥用治疗的计划时长与实际时长与随访时的心理社会结局及药物使用之间的关联。在一个改良的治疗社区中进行了一项随机试验,444名客户被分配到计划时长为3个月或6个月的项目中。结局指标为心理社会测量,评估入院和出院之间情绪和行为改变阶段的变化,以及出院后2至6个月的药物复吸情况和使用模式。计划时长与任何结局均无关联。然而,实际住院时间越长,情绪变量改善越大;随访时药物使用率越低;在随访时仍使用药物的人群中,从出院到首次用药的时间越长。意向性分析支持了这些结果。需要进行随机对照试验来区分计划时长和实际住院时间的影响。