Suppr超能文献

在儿科CT中使用动力注射器与中心和外周静脉通路装置的安全方法。

Safe use of power injectors with central and peripheral venous access devices for pediatric CT.

作者信息

Kaste S C, Young C W

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 N. Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105-2794, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(8):499-501. doi: 10.1007/BF01372228.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We report our experience in the safe use of power injectors with central and small-gauge peripheral venous access devices for intravenous administration of contrast agent to children undergoing computed tomography (CT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 500 patients randomly selected from the 3121 children who underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced CT examinations at our institution from November 1993 through July 1995.

RESULTS

The group of 500 patients, all younger than 18 years of age, accounts for 16 % of the contrast-enhanced CT examinations performed during the study period. Medrad MCT 311 Mark V or Medrad MCT Plus 311 power injectors were used to intravenously administer Omnipaque 300 (2 ml/kg, maximum dose = 150 ml) through venous access devices. These devices comprised Hickman or Broviac lines (n = 228), subcutaneous Port-A-Caths (n = 55), small-gauge butterfly needles (n = 215), and percutaneous intravenous central lines (n = 2). Two complications, one involving a Hickman line and the other a subcutaneous Port-A-Cath, occurred in the study population. These complications correspond to a frequency of 0.4 %. Six cases of contrast extravasation, all of them with the use of 23- (n = 1) and 25-gauge (n = 5) butterfly catheters (frequency = 0.2 %), occurred among the remaining 2621 cases.

CONCLUSION

In light of the low frequency of complications, power injectors and central venous access devices or small-gauge butterfly catheters are safe systems for delivery of intravenous contrast material to pediatric patients. We feel that our strict adherence to manufacturers' guidelines and previously reported techniques partially accounts for our success with these modes of delivery.

摘要

目的

我们报告在对接受计算机断层扫描(CT)检查的儿童静脉注射造影剂时,使用动力注射器经中心静脉和小口径外周静脉通路装置的安全经验。

材料与方法

我们回顾了1993年11月至1995年7月在我院接受静脉造影增强CT检查的3121名儿童中随机抽取的500例患者的病历。

结果

这500例患者均未满18岁,占研究期间进行的造影增强CT检查的16%。使用Medrad MCT 311 Mark V或Medrad MCT Plus 311动力注射器通过静脉通路装置静脉注射欧乃派克300(2 ml/kg,最大剂量=150 ml)。这些装置包括Hickman或Broviac导管(n = 228)、皮下植入式静脉输液港(n = 55)、小口径蝶形针(n = 215)和经皮中心静脉导管(n = 2)。研究人群中发生了2例并发症,1例涉及Hickman导管,另1例涉及皮下植入式静脉输液港。这些并发症的发生率为0.4%。在其余2621例病例中,发生了6例造影剂外渗,均使用23G(n = 1)和25G(n = 5)蝶形导管(发生率=0.2%)。

结论

鉴于并发症发生率较低,动力注射器和中心静脉通路装置或小口径蝶形导管是向儿科患者输送静脉造影剂的安全系统。我们认为,严格遵守制造商的指南和先前报道的技术是我们在这些给药方式上取得成功的部分原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验