Kumar A, Mohan U, Jain V C
Upgraded Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, K.G. Medical College, Lucknow, India.
Public Health. 1996 Jul;110(4):241-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80110-7.
Academic staff of Lucknow University (India) and its various faculties were questioned to know their attitudes and beliefs regarding various anti-smoking measures, using a questionnaire based on WHO guidelines. Of the male teachers 21.4% were current smokers and 12.3% were ex-smokers. Non-smokers were in greater agreement with various anti-smoking measures than current and ex-smokers, while more females-all of whom were non-smokers-than their male counterparts supported these measures. Endorsement of various anti-smoking measures differed from group to group, however, academicians agreed most with the notion that "Everybody has a right to breath air free of tobacco smoke'. "Sale of tobacco completely banned' was the measure opposed by most of the academicians. "Preventing diseases' and "Religious reasons' were, respectively, the most and least important motives for not smoking.
印度勒克瑙大学及其各学院的学术人员接受了问卷调查,以了解他们对各种反吸烟措施的态度和看法,该问卷基于世界卫生组织的指导方针编制。在男教师中,21.4%为当前吸烟者,12.3%为曾经吸烟者。与当前吸烟者和曾经吸烟者相比,非吸烟者对各种反吸烟措施的认同度更高,而且支持这些措施的女性(她们均为非吸烟者)比男性更多。然而,不同群体对各种反吸烟措施的认可程度有所不同,学者们最认同的观点是“每个人都有呼吸无烟空气的权利”。“完全禁止烟草销售”是大多数学者反对的措施。“预防疾病”和“宗教原因”分别是不吸烟最重要和最不重要的动机。