Katsouyanni K, Schwartz J, Spix C, Touloumi G, Zmirou D, Zanobetti A, Wojtyniak B, Vonk J M, Tobias A, Pönkä A, Medina S, Bachárová L, Anderson H R
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School, Greece.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.suppl_1.s12.
Results from several studies over the past five years have shown that the current levels of pollutants in Europe and North America have adverse short term effects on health. The APHEA project aims to quantifying these in Europe, using standardised methodology. The project protocol and analytical methodology are presented here.
Daily time series data were gathered for several air pollutants (sulphur dioxide; particulate matter, measured as total particles or as the particle fraction with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than a certain cut off, or as black smoke; nitrogen dioxide; and ozone) and health outcomes (the total and cause specific number of deaths and emergency hospital admissions). The data included fulfilled the quality criteria set by the APHEA protocol.
Fifteen European cities from 10 different countries with a total population over 25 million.
The APHEA collaborative group decided on a specific methodological procedure to control for confounding effects and evaluate the hypothesis. At the same time there was sufficient flexibility to allow local characteristics to be taken into account. The procedure included modelling of all potential confounding factors (that is, seasonal and long term patterns, meteorological factors, day of the week, holidays, and other unusual events), choosing the "best" air pollution models, and applying diagnostic tools to check the adequacy of the models. The final analysis used autoregressive Poisson models allowing for overdispersion. Effects were reported as relative risks contrasting defined increases in the corresponding pollutant levels. Each participating group applied the analyses to their own data.
This methodology enabled results from many different European settings to be considered collectively. It represented the best available compromise between feasibility, comparability, and local adaptibility when using aggregated time series data not originally collected for the purpose of epidemiological studies.
过去五年多项研究结果表明,欧洲和北美的当前污染物水平对健康有短期不利影响。APHEA项目旨在采用标准化方法对欧洲的这些影响进行量化。本文介绍了该项目的方案和分析方法。
收集了几种空气污染物(二氧化硫;颗粒物,以总颗粒数、空气动力学直径小于特定临界值的颗粒部分或黑烟形式测量;二氧化氮;以及臭氧)和健康结果(死亡总数及死因别死亡数和急诊入院数)的每日时间序列数据。所纳入的数据符合APHEA方案设定的质量标准。
来自10个不同国家的15个欧洲城市,总人口超过2500万。
APHEA协作组确定了一种特定的方法程序来控制混杂效应并评估假设。同时有足够的灵活性以考虑当地特征。该程序包括对所有潜在混杂因素(即季节和长期模式、气象因素、星期几、节假日及其他异常事件)进行建模,选择“最佳”空气污染模型,并应用诊断工具检查模型的充分性。最终分析使用了允许过度离散的自回归泊松模型。效应以对比相应污染物水平定义增加量的相对风险来报告。每个参与组都将分析应用于其自己的数据。
这种方法能够综合考虑来自许多不同欧洲地区的结果。在使用并非最初为流行病学研究目的而收集的汇总时间序列数据时,它代表了在可行性、可比性和局部适应性之间的最佳折衷方案。