Suppr超能文献

安乐死与法律。

Euthanasia and the law.

作者信息

Brazier M

机构信息

Faculty of Law, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Br Med Bull. 1996 Apr;52(2):317-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011546.

Abstract

This paper examines why the law concerns itself with euthanasia. The nature of the right to life and its protection in law is explored. Such a right demands legal intervention to prohibit, or at least control, involuntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is not a violation of the individual's right to life as such, so on what grounds can law limit autonomy by prohibiting such conduct? It is suggested that, while concepts of sanctity of life still play a part in the legal debate, fears of abuse in any scheme for voluntary euthanasia largely explain the reluctance of many jurisdictions to follow the example of The Netherlands. Finally, the paper asks whether reform and regulation of voluntary euthanasia are as attractive options as they are sometimes portrayed.

摘要

本文探讨了法律为何关注安乐死这一问题。文中探究了生命权的本质及其在法律中的保护。这样一项权利需要法律干预以禁止,或至少控制非自愿和非主动安乐死。自愿安乐死本身并不侵犯个人的生命权,那么法律基于何种理由通过禁止此类行为来限制自主权呢?有人认为,虽然生命神圣的观念在法律辩论中仍发挥着作用,但对自愿安乐死任何方案中滥用情况的担忧在很大程度上解释了许多司法管辖区不愿效仿荷兰的原因。最后,本文提出自愿安乐死的改革与监管是否如有时所描述的那般具有吸引力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验