Brazier M
Faculty of Law, University of Manchester, UK.
Br Med Bull. 1996 Apr;52(2):317-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011546.
This paper examines why the law concerns itself with euthanasia. The nature of the right to life and its protection in law is explored. Such a right demands legal intervention to prohibit, or at least control, involuntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is not a violation of the individual's right to life as such, so on what grounds can law limit autonomy by prohibiting such conduct? It is suggested that, while concepts of sanctity of life still play a part in the legal debate, fears of abuse in any scheme for voluntary euthanasia largely explain the reluctance of many jurisdictions to follow the example of The Netherlands. Finally, the paper asks whether reform and regulation of voluntary euthanasia are as attractive options as they are sometimes portrayed.
本文探讨了法律为何关注安乐死这一问题。文中探究了生命权的本质及其在法律中的保护。这样一项权利需要法律干预以禁止,或至少控制非自愿和非主动安乐死。自愿安乐死本身并不侵犯个人的生命权,那么法律基于何种理由通过禁止此类行为来限制自主权呢?有人认为,虽然生命神圣的观念在法律辩论中仍发挥着作用,但对自愿安乐死任何方案中滥用情况的担忧在很大程度上解释了许多司法管辖区不愿效仿荷兰的原因。最后,本文提出自愿安乐死的改革与监管是否如有时所描述的那般具有吸引力。