Jochemsen H
Lindeboom Institute, The Netherlands.
J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec;20(4):212-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.4.212.
In the Netherlands the government's proposal for the legal regulation of euthanasia, assisted suicide and the termination of a patient's life without request has been approved by Parliament. The defence of this proposal is to a large extent based on a specific interpretation of data about the practice of euthanasia in that country, published in 1991 (the Remmelink Report). This paper discusses both the interpretation of the data and the new law. On the basis of that and other data, the author concludes that many cases of euthanasia, assisted suicide and termination of a patient's life without request remain unnotified and therefore unreviewed by the legal authorities. It is argued that the new law will not guarantee an improvement to this situation. In short, the new law will not protect effectively the lives of patients, and must, therefore, be open to ethical and legal objection.
在荷兰,政府关于对安乐死、协助自杀以及未经请求终止患者生命进行法律规范的提案已获议会批准。对该提案的辩护在很大程度上基于对1991年该国公布的安乐死实施情况数据(《伦梅林克报告》)的特定解读。本文讨论了数据解读及新法律。基于这些及其他数据,作者得出结论,许多安乐死、协助自杀以及未经请求终止患者生命的案例未被上报,因此未受到法律当局的审查。有人认为新法律无法保证改善这种状况。简而言之,新法律无法有效保护患者生命,因此必然会受到伦理和法律上的质疑。