Suppr超能文献

头-宫颈力:分娩中的一个重要生理变量。2. 最大主动力、最大主动压力与分娩方式。

Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery.

作者信息

Allman A C, Genevier E S, Johnson M R, Steer P J

机构信息

Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Aug;103(8):769-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09871.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relation between peak active (above baseline) head-to-cervix force (paHCF) and peak active (above baseline) intrauterine pressure (paIUP) in labour, and to compare the relation between labours progressing well and ending in vaginal delivery and those labours progressing slowly and ending in caesarean section.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

The labour ward of a London teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty women in labour who agreed to have an experimental head-to-cervix force probe and an intrauterine pressure catheter inserted.

RESULTS

The relation was linear, with a correlation coefficient which ranged from 0.012 to 0.885 (mean value 0.438). The closeness of the relation did not correlate with the rate of cervical dilatation (r = 0.0192, P = 0.574) or the mode of delivery (r = 0.215, P = 0.183). However, in women who progressed well to a vaginal delivery, the mean slope of the paHCF to paIUP regression line was 0.72, significantly steeper than in women who progressed slowly and required delivery by caesarean section (mean slope = 0.45, t = 2.31, P = 0.02). Mean paIUPs were significantly higher in women progressing well and achieving a vaginal delivery than in those progressing slowly and requiring caesarean section (45.3 mmHg SD 7.5 vs 38.4 mmHg SD 11.4, t = 2.31, P = 0.02), but the overlap between the two groups was considerable. However, in keeping with their steeper paHCF/paIUP slope, women progressing well to a vaginal delivery had substantially higher head-to-cervix forces (46.4 gWt SD 11.8 vs 28.3 gWt SD 8.2, t = 5.22, P < 0.00001) than those progressing slowly and requiring caesarean section, and there was much less overlap between paHCF than paIUP. This resulted in paHCF being a much better discriminating variable than paIUP for mode of delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The relation between paHCF and paIUP is linear, but there is a wide variation in the degree of correlation between one woman and another. Women with a steep slope of paHCF relative to paIUP are more likely to achieve a high mean paHCF, progress rapidly in labour and achieve a vaginal delivery than women with a flap slope, although mean paIUPs do not differ substantially between the two groups. The level of paHCF was substantially better than cervical dilatation rate at predicting mode of delivery. These results suggest that head-to-cervix force is sensitive to factors determining mode of delivery which are not reflected in either the level of uterine activity as measured by intrauterine pressure, or cervical compliance as measured by cervical dilatation rates.

摘要

目的

评估分娩时峰值主动(高于基线)的头-宫颈力(paHCF)与峰值主动(高于基线)的宫内压(paIUP)之间的关系,并比较进展顺利并以阴道分娩结束的分娩与进展缓慢并以剖宫产结束的分娩之间的关系。

设计

前瞻性观察研究。

地点

伦敦一家教学医院的分娩病房。

参与者

40名同意插入实验性头-宫颈力探头和宫内压导管的分娩女性。

结果

这种关系是线性的,相关系数范围为0.012至0.885(平均值为0.438)。关系的紧密程度与宫颈扩张率(r = 0.0192,P = 0.574)或分娩方式(r = 0.215,P = 0.183)无关。然而,在进展顺利至阴道分娩的女性中,paHCF与paIUP回归线的平均斜率为0.72,明显比进展缓慢并需要剖宫产的女性更陡(平均斜率 = 0.45,t = 2.31,P = 0.02)。进展顺利并实现阴道分娩的女性的平均paIUP明显高于进展缓慢并需要剖宫产的女性(45.3 mmHg标准差7.5 vs 38.4 mmHg标准差11.4,t = 2.31,P = 0.02),但两组之间的重叠相当大。然而,与更陡的paHCF/paIUP斜率一致,进展顺利至阴道分娩的女性的头-宫颈力明显更高(46.4 gWt标准差11.8 vs 28.3 gWt标准差8.2,t = 5.22,P < 0.00001),比进展缓慢并需要剖宫产的女性高,并且paHCF之间的重叠比paIUP少得多。这导致paHCF在分娩方式的区分变量方面比paIUP好得多。

结论

paHCF与paIUP之间的关系是线性的,但个体之间的相关程度差异很大。相对于paIUP而言,paHCF斜率较陡的女性比斜率平缓的女性更有可能获得较高的平均paHCF,分娩进展迅速并实现阴道分娩,尽管两组之间的平均paIUP没有实质性差异。paHCF水平在预测分娩方式方面明显优于宫颈扩张率。这些结果表明,头-宫颈力对决定分娩方式的因素敏感,这些因素在通过宫内压测量的子宫活动水平或通过宫颈扩张率测量的宫颈顺应性中均未得到体现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验