Sohn C, Weskott H P, Schiesser M
Sektion für pränatale und gynäkologische Ultraschalldiagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsfrauenklinik Heidelberg.
Ultraschall Med. 1996 Jun;17(3):138-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1003160.
The sensitivity of the two procedures for slow blood flow velocities in two flow phantoms examined and compared to conventional colour Doppler.
In two phantoms with vessels between 0.3 and 6 mm diameter the slowest measurable blood flow with the different techniques was determined. The influence of various application angles was also studied.
The slowest blood flow velocity detected with the MEM technique was 0.6 mm/s and with the angio-technique 0.4 mm/s. Two different scan-heads were used; a 5 MHz probe for the MEM procedures and a 10 MHz probe for ultrasound angiography. Using a 10 MHz scan-head will most likely lead to increased sensitivity of MEM. Blood flow representation with the MEM technique is real-time, while several seconds of acquisition time are required for the angio-technique, which is a disadvantage during clinical use. Conventional Doppler was merely able to represent 15 mm/s blood flow. The angio-technique was less dependent on the application angle than the MEM procedure.
The definitely increased sensitivity of the two colour methods open up new areas in the diagnosis of organ and tumour perfusion.
检测并比较两种用于两个血流模型中慢血流速度的方法与传统彩色多普勒的敏感性。
在两个直径为0.3至6毫米血管的模型中,用不同技术测定可测量的最慢血流。还研究了各种应用角度的影响。
用MEM技术检测到的最慢血流速度为0.6毫米/秒,血管造影技术为0.4毫米/秒。使用了两种不同的探头;用于MEM程序的5兆赫探头和用于超声血管造影的10兆赫探头。使用10兆赫探头很可能会提高MEM的敏感性。MEM技术的血流显示是实时的,而血管造影技术需要几秒钟的采集时间,这在临床应用中是一个缺点。传统多普勒仅能显示15毫米/秒的血流。血管造影技术比MEM程序对应用角度的依赖性更小。
这两种彩色方法明显提高的敏感性为器官和肿瘤灌注诊断开辟了新领域。