• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腕管综合征的内镜手术或传统开放手术技术:一项前瞻性对比研究]

[Endoscopic operation or conventional open surgical technique in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective comparative study].

作者信息

Stark B, Engkvist-Löfmark C

机构信息

Klinik für Handchirurgie, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Schweden.

出版信息

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):128-32.

PMID:8767942
Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was performed on twenty patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Each patient had traditional open surgery on one side and single portal endoscopic release on the other. Follow-up examinations were undertaken at two, four, and twelve weeks and at eight months. The period between the two operative procedures was meanly three months (two to four months). The dominant hand was released endoscopically according to Agee in eleven cases and the non-dominant hand in nine cases. Sixteen out of twenty patients preferred the endoscopic release. Complications did not occur more frequently in patients operated endoscopically. The preoperative symptoms were relieved equally in both groups. Return to work or leisure activities was earlier in the endoscopic collective (20 days) in contrast to 30 days in the traditional operated group.

摘要

对20例双侧腕管综合征患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。每位患者一侧进行传统开放手术,另一侧进行单通道内镜松解术。在术后2周、4周、12周和8个月进行随访检查。两次手术之间的间隔平均为3个月(2至4个月)。11例患者优势手采用阿吉(Agee)内镜松解术,9例患者非优势手采用该术式。20例患者中有16例更喜欢内镜松解术。内镜手术患者并发症发生率并未更高。两组患者术前症状均得到同等程度缓解。与传统手术组的30天相比,内镜手术组患者恢复工作或休闲活动的时间更早(20天)。

相似文献

1
[Endoscopic operation or conventional open surgical technique in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective comparative study].[腕管综合征的内镜手术或传统开放手术技术:一项前瞻性对比研究]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):128-32.
2
[Agee endoscopic operation of carpal tunnel syndrome in comparison with open surgical technique].
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):143-6.
3
[Technique, results and risks of endoscopic carpal tunnel release].[内镜下腕管松解术的技术、结果及风险]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):120-7.
4
[Carpal tunnel syndrome. A comparison of endoscopic and open surgical treatment].[腕管综合征。内镜手术与开放手术治疗的比较]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):133-7.
5
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.使用KnifeLight进行微创腕管减压术。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249249.33052.7E.
6
[Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic or classical (open)? A prospective randomized trial].[腕管综合征的手术治疗:内镜手术还是传统(开放)手术?一项前瞻性随机试验]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 May 3;141(18):878-82.
7
[Complications of endoscopic retinaculum dissection].[内镜下支持带松解术的并发症]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1997 Sep;29(5):238-42.
8
Carpal tunnel release by the Agee endoscopic technique. Results at 4 year follow-up.采用阿吉内镜技术进行腕管松解术。4年随访结果。
J Hand Surg Br. 1999 Oct;24(5):583-5. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0226.
9
[Reintervention after endoscopic surgery of the carpal tunnel syndrome].[腕管综合征内镜手术后的再次干预]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Aug;39(4):293-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965318.
10
Endoscopic release in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of clinical results in 200 cases.腕管综合征的内镜下松解术:200例临床结果分析
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2003 Feb;46(1):11-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37966.

引用本文的文献

1
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Markov Cost-Effectiveness Decision Analysis.富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗轻中度腕管综合征:马尔可夫成本效益决策分析。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jan;19(1):113-127. doi: 10.1177/15589447221092056. Epub 2022 May 22.
2
Optimizing Costs and Outcomes for Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from Societal and Health-Care System Perspectives.优化腕管松解手术的成本与效果:从社会和医疗保健系统角度进行的成本效益分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 1;103(23):2190-2199. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.02126. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
内镜下和开放性松解术治疗腕管综合征同样安全。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0143683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143683. eCollection 2015.
4
Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.比较开放性与内镜下腕管松解术的研究中报告重返工作情况的分析:随机对照试验综述
Can J Plast Surg. 2005 Winter;13(4):181-7. doi: 10.1177/229255030501300403.
5
Carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征
BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Mar 23;2010:1114.
6
A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.开放性与内镜下腕管松解术的成本效用分析
Can J Plast Surg. 2006 Spring;14(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/229255030601400101.
7
Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.CONSORT声明在比较内镜下与开放性腕管松解术的随机对照试验中的应用。
Can J Plast Surg. 2006 Winter;14(4):205-10. doi: 10.1177/229255030601400401.
8
Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003905.pub3.