Holland R, Gallagher M D, Quigley E M
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-2000, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Aug;41(8):1531-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02087896.
While abnormalities in antroduodenal motor function have been documented in both organic and "functional" disorders, controversy surrounds the ideal manometric technique. We sought, therefore, to evaluate a digital solid-state ambulatory system. Sixteen normal volunteers underwent 24-hr recordings of antroduodenal motility. Following catheter placement, a standardized meal was ingested in the laboratory; thereafter, subjects were ambulatory and assumed normal diet and activities. The system was well tolerated; subjects reported that it did not affect their usual activities. Migrating motor complex (MMC) activity was identified in each subject (mean frequency: 4.1 MMCs/24 hr, range 1-8); on average 1.9 (range 0-4, frequency 0.1/hr) occurred while awake and 2.1 (range 0-5, 0.3/hr, P < 0.05 vs awake) during sleep. The fed response was evaluated by calculating a motility index (MI) at 30-min intervals from 30 min before to 120 min following meal ingestion. Postprandially, MI was maximal during the first 30 min following meal ingestion: MI (mean +/- SD) 30 min before vs 30 min after meal in the antrum: 4.16 +/- 1.42 vs 5.33 +/- 0.72 (P < 0.05), duodenum: 4.04 +/- 0.80 vs 4.57 +/- 0.47 (P < 0.05), respectively. None of the other postprandial intervals were significantly different from baseline. There was no significant difference in MI between the standard and ad libitum meals. Retrograde catheter migration (mean 5.6, range 1-10 cm) occurred in relation to all meals: as a consequence, antral recordings were lost following 60% of all meals, thereby limiting meaningful analysis of the antral fed response. We conclude, firstly, that while an ambulatory antroduodenal manometry system is well tolerated and reliably records duodenal motility, postprandial catheter migration limits antral recordings, and, secondly, that a motility index calculated during the first 30 min following an ad libitum meal accurately reflects the fed motor response.
虽然在器质性疾病和“功能性”疾病中均已记录到胃十二指肠运动功能异常,但关于理想的测压技术仍存在争议。因此,我们试图评估一种数字固态动态监测系统。16名正常志愿者接受了24小时的胃十二指肠动力记录。放置导管后,在实验室摄入标准化餐食;此后,受试者可自由活动并保持正常饮食和活动。该系统耐受性良好;受试者报告称其未影响日常活动。在每名受试者中均识别出移行性运动复合波(MMC)活动(平均频率:4.1次MMC/24小时,范围1 - 8次);平均清醒时出现1.9次(范围0 - 4次,频率0.1次/小时),睡眠时出现2.1次(范围0 - 5次,0.3次/小时,与清醒时相比P < 0.05)。通过在摄入餐食前30分钟至摄入后120分钟每隔30分钟计算一次动力指数(MI)来评估进食反应。餐后,MI在摄入餐食后的前30分钟内达到最大值:胃窦部在摄入餐食前30分钟与摄入后30分钟的MI(平均值±标准差):4.16±1.42 vs 5.33±0.72(P < 0.05),十二指肠:4.04±0.80 vs 4.57±0.47(P < 0.05)。其他餐后时间段与基线相比均无显著差异。标准餐和随意餐之间的MI无显著差异。与所有餐食相关均发生了导管逆行移位(平均5.6厘米,范围1 - 10厘米);因此,60%的餐食后胃窦部记录丢失,从而限制了对胃窦部进食反应的有意义分析。我们得出结论,首先,虽然动态胃十二指肠测压系统耐受性良好且能可靠记录十二指肠动力,但餐后导管移位限制了胃窦部记录;其次,随意餐食后前30分钟计算的动力指数准确反映了进食后的运动反应。