Chinkes D L, Aarsland A, Rosenblatt J, Wolfe R R
Metabolism Unit, Shriners Burns Institute, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1996 Aug;271(2 Pt 1):E373-83. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.2.E373.
The recent development of mass isotopomer distribution methods represents an important new tool for quantifying synthetic rates. These methods allow precursor enrichment to be determined indirectly from the enrichment of the product, thus sidestepping the often difficult problem of measuring the precursor enrichment. Two different methods have been described to compute synthetic rates by this general approach in the laboratories of M. K. Hellerstein and J. K. Kelleher, and variations of these basic approaches have also been presented by W. N. Lee and by ourselves. A comparison between the different methods has never been reported. In this paper, we take a specific application, calculation of the fractional rate of incorporation of acetyl-CoA into very low density lipoprotein-bound palmitate, and compare the results obtained from all of the mass isotopomer methods using the same data set obtained in vivo in human subjects. We found that it is critical that the measured background isotopomer distribution of palmitate is used rather than the theoretical background isotopomer distribution. We also found that the different methods give comparable precursor enrichments and comparable fractional synthesis rates, provided that the enrichments in Kelleher's method are properly weighted. Thus the choice of method to use is a matter of personal preference.
近期质量同位素异构体分布方法的发展成为定量合成速率的一项重要新工具。这些方法允许从前体富集间接确定产物的富集情况,从而避开了测量前体富集这一常常困难的问题。在M. K. 赫勒斯坦和J. K. 凯莱赫的实验室中,已经描述了两种通过这种通用方法计算合成速率的不同方法,并且W. N. 李和我们自己也提出了这些基本方法的变体。不同方法之间的比较从未有过报道。在本文中,我们选取一个具体应用,即计算乙酰辅酶A掺入极低密度脂蛋白结合棕榈酸酯的分数速率,并使用在人类受试者体内获得的相同数据集,比较所有质量同位素异构体方法得到的结果。我们发现使用实测的棕榈酸酯背景同位素异构体分布而非理论背景同位素异构体分布至关重要。我们还发现,只要凯莱赫方法中的富集量得到适当加权,不同方法会给出可比的前体富集量和可比的分数合成速率。因此,使用哪种方法是个人偏好问题。