Foa E B, Franklin M E, Perry K J, Herbert J D
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Pennsylvania, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1996 Aug;105(3):433-9.
Judgmental biases for threat-relevant stimuli are thought to be important mechanisms underlying the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders. The authors hypothesized (a) that people with generalized social phobia (GSP) would rate negative social events but not nonsocial events as more probable and costly than would nonanxious controls (NACs) and (b) that cognitive behavioral treatment would decrease probability and cost estimates for social but not nonsocial events. Participants with GSP and NACs were assessed twice, 14 weeks apart, during which the former received cognitive behavioral therapy. Those with GSP evidenced socially relevant judgmental biases prior to treatment, and these were attenuated following treatment. Reduction in cost estimates for social events, but not in probability estimates, mediated improvement in social phobia. Results are discussed in light of emotional processing theory.
对与威胁相关刺激的判断偏差被认为是焦虑症病因和维持的重要潜在机制。作者假设:(a)广泛性社交恐惧症(GSP)患者会比非焦虑对照组(NACs)将负面社交事件而非非社交事件评定为更有可能且代价更高;(b)认知行为疗法会降低社交事件而非非社交事件的可能性和代价估计。GSP参与者和NACs在相隔14周的时间里接受了两次评估,在此期间,前者接受了认知行为疗法。GSP患者在治疗前表现出与社交相关的判断偏差,治疗后这些偏差有所减弱。社交事件代价估计的降低而非可能性估计的降低,介导了社交恐惧症的改善。根据情绪加工理论对结果进行了讨论。