Gerrans Philip, Murray Ryan J
Department of Philosophy, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Neurosci Conscious. 2020 Dec 30;2020(1):niaa026. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaa026. eCollection 2020.
This article provides an interoceptive active inference (IAI) account of social anxiety disorder (SAD). Through a neurocognitive framework, we argue that the cognitive and behavioural profile of SAD is best conceived of as a form of maladaptive IAI produced by a negatively biased self-model that cannot reconcile inconsistent tendencies to approach and avoid social interaction. Anticipated future social interactions produce interoceptive prediction error (bodily states of arousal). These interoceptive states are transcribed and experienced as states of distress due to the influence of inconsistent and unstable self-models across a hierarchy of interrelated systems involved in emotional, interoceptive and affective processing. We highlight the role of the insula cortex, in concert with the striatum, amygdala and dorsal anterior cingulate in the generation and reduction of interoceptive prediction errors as well as the resolution of social approach-avoidance conflict. The novelty of our account is a shift in explanatory priority from the representation of the social world in SAD to the representation of the SAD self. In particular, we show how a high-level conceptual self-model of social vulnerability and inadequacy fails to minimize prediction errors produced by a basic drive for social affiliation combined with strong avoidant tendencies. The result is a cascade of interoceptive prediction errors whose attempted minimization through action (i.e. active inference) yields the symptom profile of SAD. We conclude this article by proposing testable hypotheses to further investigate the neurocognitive traits of the SAD self with respect to IAI.
本文提供了一种关于社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的内感受主动推理(IAI)解释。通过一个神经认知框架,我们认为社交焦虑障碍的认知和行为特征最好被理解为一种由负性偏差的自我模型产生的适应不良的内感受主动推理形式,这种自我模型无法协调接近和回避社交互动的不一致倾向。预期的未来社交互动会产生内感受预测误差(身体的唤醒状态)。由于在涉及情绪、内感受和情感处理的相互关联系统层次结构中,不一致和不稳定的自我模型的影响,这些内感受状态被转录并体验为痛苦状态。我们强调了脑岛皮层与纹状体、杏仁核和背侧前扣带回在产生和减少内感受预测误差以及解决社交接近-回避冲突方面的作用。我们解释的新颖之处在于解释优先级从社交焦虑障碍中社会世界的表征转向社交焦虑障碍自我的表征。特别是,我们展示了一个关于社交脆弱性和不足的高级概念自我模型如何未能最小化由基本的社交归属驱动力与强烈的回避倾向相结合所产生的预测误差。结果是一连串的内感受预测误差,通过行动(即主动推理)试图最小化这些误差会产生社交焦虑障碍的症状特征。我们通过提出可检验的假设来结束本文,以进一步研究社交焦虑障碍自我在涉及内感受主动推理方面的神经认知特征。