Ichise M, Ballinger J R, Golan H, Vines D, Luong A, Tsai S, Kung H F
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
J Nucl Med. 1996 Mar;37(3):513-20.
Iodine-123-iodobenzofuran (IBF) is a potent dopamine D2 receptor ligand suited for quantitative receptor studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate three noninvasive methods of estimating the receptor parameter k3/k4 in humans with IBF-SPECT.
Scans were acquired every 5 min for 180 min using a triple-headed SPECT system following a bolus injection of IBF (296 +/- 37 MBq) in 14 normal volunteers. k3/k4 was estimated by the peak equilibrium ratio (RPE) method and two proposed methods: a variation of the graphic method that derives the ratio of ligand distribution volumes (RV) and area ratio (RA) method, in which the ratio is calculated from the areas under the specific binding and nondisplaceable activity curves.
The mean RPE, RV and RA were 2.74 +/- 0.40, 3.06 +/- 0.42 and 2.26 +/- 0.28, respectively. Both RPE and RA underestimated RV. The relationship between RPE or RA and RV was linear (p < or = 10(-5), RA showed higher correlation (r = 0.94) with RV than did RPE (r = 0.90). Simulations based on a tracer kinetic model showed that RV, unlike RPE or RA, is affected by neither regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) nor peripheral clearance rate (CR) of IBF. All three measures showed a significant decline with increasing age (r = 0.54-0.58, p < 0.05).
RV is preferred because it provides a theoretically valid estimate of k3/k4, independently of rCBF or CR. Alternatively, RA might be preferred to RPE because the former is simpler than the latter to implement yet the former provides a measure that equally well correlates with k3/k4.
碘-123-碘苯并呋喃(IBF)是一种适用于定量受体研究的强效多巴胺D2受体配体。本研究的目的是评估三种用IBF单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在人体中估算受体参数k3/k4的非侵入性方法。
对14名正常志愿者静脉推注IBF(296±37兆贝可)后,使用三头SPECT系统每5分钟采集一次扫描图像,共采集180分钟。通过峰值平衡比(RPE)法和两种提议的方法估算k3/k4:一种是推导配体分布容积比(RV)的图形法变体,另一种是面积比(RA)法,即从特异性结合和非置换活性曲线下的面积计算该比值。
RPE、RV和RA的平均值分别为2.74±0.40、3.06±0.42和2.26±0.28。RPE和RA均低估了RV。RPE或RA与RV之间呈线性关系(p≤10⁻⁵),RA与RV的相关性(r = 0.94)高于RPE与RV的相关性(r = 0.90)。基于示踪剂动力学模型的模拟显示,与RPE或RA不同,RV不受局部脑血流量(rCBF)或IBF外周清除率(CR)的影响。所有三种测量值均随年龄增长而显著下降(r = 0.54 - 0.58,p < 0.05)。
RV更受青睐,因为它能独立于rCBF或CR提供理论上有效的k3/k4估算值。或者,RA可能比RPE更可取,因为前者比后者实施起来更简单,且前者提供的测量值与k3/k4的相关性同样良好。