Gordon A M, Soechting J F
Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 1995;107(2):281-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00230048.
We have investigated how tactile afferent information contributes to the generation of sequences of skilled finger movements by anesthetizing the right index fingers of experienced typists. Subjects were asked to type phrases in which the right index finger was used only once every seven to 12 keypresses. The time at which each key was depressed was recorded with a digital timer, and the translational and rotational motion of the fingers and wrist of the right hand were recorded optoelectronically from the location of reflective markers placed on the fingers. Midway through the experiment, a local anesthetic was injected at the base of the distal phalange of the right index finger. Following digital anesthesia, error rates increased considerably, mainly due to the diminished accuracy of movements of the anesthetized finger. The typing intervals following keypresses with the anesthetized fingertip were unaffected by the removal of tactile information. When errors occurred during control trials, the intervals immediately following the errors were greatly prolonged. However, errors produced with the anesthetized right index finger did not influence the timing of subsequent keypresses, implying that lack of tactile cues affected error recognition. The movement patterns during keypresses were similar before and after digital anesthesia for some subjects, while a less pronounced flexion-extension movement was seen in other subjects. The results suggest that tactile afferent information is not essential for initiating movement segments in a sequence. Rather, they emphasize the importance of this information for ensuring movement accuracy and for detecting errors.
我们通过麻醉经验丰富的打字员的右手食指,研究了触觉传入信息如何有助于熟练手指运动序列的产生。受试者被要求输入短语,其中右手食指每按七到十二次键才使用一次。每个按键被按下的时间用数字定时器记录,右手手指和手腕的平移和旋转运动通过放置在手指上的反光标记的位置以光电方式记录。在实验进行到一半时,在右手食指远端指骨基部注射局部麻醉剂。数字麻醉后,错误率大幅上升,主要是由于麻醉手指运动的准确性下降。用麻醉指尖按键后的打字间隔不受触觉信息去除的影响。在对照试验中出现错误时,错误后紧接着的间隔会大大延长。然而,用麻醉的右手食指产生的错误并不影响后续按键的时间,这意味着缺乏触觉线索会影响错误识别。对于一些受试者,数字麻醉前后按键时的运动模式相似,而在其他受试者中则观察到屈伸运动不太明显。结果表明,触觉传入信息对于启动序列中的运动片段并非必不可少。相反,它们强调了这些信息对于确保运动准确性和检测错误的重要性。