Chen K S, Lo S K, Lee N, Leu M L, Huang C C, Fang K M
Division of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Nephron. 1996;73(2):158-64. doi: 10.1159/000189033.
A survey of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBSAG) and antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 173 patients undergoing hemodialysis in Taiwan revealed that 15 (9%) patients were positive for both HBSAG and anti-HCV, 106 (61%) were positive for anti-HCV alone, and 14 (8%) were positive for HBSAG alone. Most HBSAg positivity was acquired before the onset of hemodialysis. Anti-HCV positivity, however, was mainly acquired via the hemodialysis procedure. Patients with dual markers were younger (43.7 +/- 3.3 years old, p = 0.0274), had the longest period on hemodialysis (6.6 +/- 1.3 years, p < 0.001), and more severe liver dysfunction. When compared with those who were negative for both markers, patients with both HBSAG and anti-HCV had an increased incidence of chronicity (5/15 vs. 2/38; p < 0.05), ultrasonographic cirrhosis (5/15 vs. 1/38; p < 0.05), and clinical decompensation (2/15 vs. 0/38; p < 0.05). Their risk for developing ultrasonographic cirrhosis and clinical decompensation was also greater than that of patients with anti-HCV alone (5/15 vs. 8/106 and 2/15 vs. 2/106; p < 0.05 for both). The presence of HBSAG alone, however, did not increase the incidence of liver dysfunction. The presence of anti-HCV alone was only associated with a greater elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (44.2 +/- 5.5 vs. 19.1 +/- 2.5 U/l; p < 0.05) and an increased incidence of chronicity (30/106 vs. 2/38; p < 0.05). Our results indicate that a high prevalence of HCV superinfection impose a significant risk on a large population of HBSAG-positive hemodialysis patients in Taiwan. As the coexistence of anti-HCV and HBSAG is associated with more severe liver dysfunction, it is urgent to devise effective methods to prevent HCV circulation in a hemodialysis environment-especially in a hepatitis B virus endemic area such as Taiwan.
一项针对台湾173名接受血液透析患者的乙肝表面抗原(HBSAG)和丙型肝炎病毒抗体(抗-HCV)的调查显示,15名(9%)患者HBSAG和抗-HCV均呈阳性,106名(61%)仅抗-HCV呈阳性,14名(8%)仅HBSAG呈阳性。大多数HBSAg阳性是在血液透析开始前获得的。然而,抗-HCV阳性主要是通过血液透析过程获得的。双重标志物阳性的患者更年轻(43.7±3.3岁,p = 0.0274),血液透析时间最长(6.6±1.3年,p < 0.001),肝功能障碍更严重。与两种标志物均为阴性的患者相比,HBSAG和抗-HCV均阳性的患者慢性化发生率增加(5/15对2/38;p < 0.05),超声肝硬化发生率增加(5/15对1/38;p < 0.05),临床失代偿发生率增加(2/15对0/38;p < 0.05)。他们发生超声肝硬化和临床失代偿的风险也高于仅抗-HCV阳性的患者(5/15对8/106和2/15对2/106;两者p均< 0.05)。然而,仅HBSAG的存在并未增加肝功能障碍的发生率。仅抗-HCV的存在仅与血清丙氨酸转氨酶升高幅度更大(44.2±5.5对19.1±2.5 U/l;p < 0.05)和慢性化发生率增加(30/106对2/38;p < 0.05)相关。我们的结果表明,HCV重叠感染的高流行率给台湾大量HBSAG阳性血液透析患者带来了重大风险。由于抗-HCV和HBSAG共存与更严重的肝功能障碍相关,迫切需要制定有效的方法来防止HCV在血液透析环境中传播——尤其是在台湾这样的乙肝病毒流行地区。