• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

作者信息

Gerber G S, Thisted R A, Scardino P T, Frohmuller H G, Schroeder F H, Paulson D F, Middleton A W, Rukstalis D B, Smith J A, Schellhammer P F, Ohori M, Chodak G W

机构信息

Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago (III) Pritzker School of Medicine, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):615-9.

PMID:8773633
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of radical prostatectomy in men with early prostate cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled analysis.

SETTING

Eight university medical centers in the United States and Europe.

PATIENTS

A total of 2758 men with stage Tl and T2 prostatic cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease-specific and metastasis-free survival rates.

RESULTS

Tumor grade was the most important preoperative factor in determining outcome. Disease-specific survival 10 years following surgery and associated 95% confidence intervals were 94% (range, 87%-98%), 80% (range, 74%-85%), and 77% (range, 65%-86%) for those men with grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively. Metastasis-free survival at 10 years was 87% (range, 78%-92%), 68% (range, 62%-73%), and 52% (range, 38%-64%) for patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 cancers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy leads to high 10-year disease-specific survival rates in men with all tumor grades. However, caution is needed in comparing these results with similar studies of alternative treatment strategies, such as watchful waiting, due to the inherent potential biases in uncontrolled trials. Nevertheless, these results offer the best currently available estimates of 10-year outcome of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and may be useful in counseling patients with early malignancy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):615-9.
2
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer - 29-Year Follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术与前列腺癌观察等待-29 年随访结果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-2329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801.
3
The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌干预与观察试验:退伍军人事务部/美国国立癌症研究所/医疗保健研究与质量局合作研究项目#407(PIVOT):一项随机对照试验的设计及基线结果,该试验比较了根治性前列腺切除术与对临床局限性前列腺癌男性进行观察等待的效果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
4
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial.局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待治疗的比较:斯堪的纳维亚前列腺癌研究组-4随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn255. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
5
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与早期前列腺癌的观察等待。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 5;364(18):1708-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011967.
6
A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.一项比较早期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 12;347(11):781-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012794.
7
Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.主动监测、根治性前列腺切除术和根治性放疗在 PSA 检测到的局限性前列腺癌中的应用:ProtecT 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(37):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24370.
8
The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.前列腺癌干预与观察试验:退伍军人事务部/美国国立癌症研究所/医疗保健研究与质量局合作研究项目#407(PIVOT):一项比较根治性前列腺切除术与对临床局限性前列腺癌男性进行观察等待的随机对照试验的设计和基线结果
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):184-90. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs041.
9
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与局限性前列腺癌的延迟治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3.
10
Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异抗原(PSA)升高后的疾病进展自然史。
JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1591-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1591.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Gleason score using the initial serum total prostate-specific antigen in Black men with symptomatic prostate adenocarcinoma in Nigeria.使用尼日利亚有症状前列腺腺癌黑人患者初始血清总前列腺特异性抗原预测 Gleason 评分。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Jul 18;11:961-6. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S98232. eCollection 2016.
2
The impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes for patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer.体重指数对低中危前列腺癌患者治疗结果的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 29;16:557. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2572-y.
3
Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
神经周围侵犯状态、Gleason评分以及活检病理中阳性核心的数量是腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的预测指标。
Asian J Androl. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(4):468-472. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.173444.
4
Wrong to be Right: Margin Laterality is an Independent Predictor of Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy.错中之对:切缘偏向是前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的独立预测因素
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan;41(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000216.
5
Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 prostatic adenocarcinoma.Gleason 评分 8 - 10 分的前列腺腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的长期预后
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1385-92. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1253-1. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
6
An accurate prostate cancer prognosticator using a seven-gene signature plus Gleason score and taking cell type heterogeneity into account.一种基于七个基因标志物、Gleason 评分并考虑细胞类型异质性的前列腺癌预后准确预测器。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045178. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
7
High-grade prostate cancer: favorable results in the modern era regardless of initial treatment.高级别前列腺癌:无论初始治疗方式如何,在现代都能取得良好疗效。
ISRN Oncol. 2012;2012:596029. doi: 10.5402/2012/596029. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
8
First danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: biochemical outcome in 1200 consecutive patients.丹麦首例单机构根治性前列腺切除术经验:1200例连续患者的生化结果
Prostate Cancer. 2011;2011:236357. doi: 10.1155/2011/236357. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
Prediction of patient-specific risk and percentile cohort risk of pathological stage outcome using continuous prostate-specific antigen measurement, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score.利用连续前列腺特异性抗原测量、临床分期和活检 Gleason 评分预测患者特异性风险和百分位队列风险的病理分期结果。
BJU Int. 2011 May;107(10):1562-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09692.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
10
Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.在病理标本中,高 Gleason 评分的男性接受根治性前列腺切除术的长期生存。
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):715-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.085. Epub 2010 Mar 29.