Dilks S L, Shattock L
Department of Psychology, Springfield Hospital, London.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 May;35(2):183-92. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01175.x.
The focus of the debate over hospital versus community care for those with severe and enduring mental health problems has shifted somewhat towards ensuring the quality of care provided by services regardless of their location. One factor that is generally assumed to be an important indicator of quality of care is the opportunity for community contact that users of a residential service have. This is illustrated by its inclusion in most instruments designed to assess quality of care in psychiatric services. The present study set out to examine the amount of community contact made by residents of three units of a London psychiatric rehabilitation service. Level of community contact was indeed found to be unrelated to the location of these facilities on a hospital site or in the community. However, interesting differences did emerge across units in the type of community contact made by residents and in the identity of residents' companions on community trips.
对于患有严重且持续性心理健康问题的患者,关于医院护理与社区护理的争论焦点已有所转移,转向确保无论服务位于何处,其提供的护理质量。通常被认为是护理质量重要指标的一个因素是住院服务使用者进行社区接触的机会。这一点在大多数旨在评估精神科服务护理质量的工具中都有体现。本研究旨在调查伦敦一家精神科康复服务机构三个单元的住院患者进行社区接触的次数。研究发现,社区接触程度确实与这些设施位于医院院区还是社区无关。然而,各单元的住院患者进行社区接触的类型以及社区出行时陪伴人员的身份确实出现了有趣的差异。