Richards T B, Rogers J J, Christenson G M, Miller C A, Gatewood D D, Taylor M S
Division of Public Health Systems, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;11(6 Suppl):36-40.
Factor analysis, combined with an evaluation of item difficulty and discrimination, can provide useful insights in questionnaire development. In 1993, as part of a study to develop a questionnaire to assess performance of the core functions of public health at a community level, 370 local health departments (LHDs) in six states completed a 26-item questionnaire (94% response). This study describes factor analysis results after controlling for item difficulty and discrimination. Fifteen items had intermediate difficulty and fair-to-good discrimination. Factor analysis of these 15 items identified four factors. Three of these factors included items from more than one of the core functions. These findings pose an interesting question for future research: are the core functions of public health better conceived as three discrete, distinguishable factors or as three interlocking factors that form a single, seamless unit?
因子分析,结合项目难度和区分度评估,可为问卷开发提供有用的见解。1993年,作为开发一份用于评估社区层面公共卫生核心功能执行情况问卷研究的一部分,六个州的370个地方卫生部门(LHD)完成了一份包含26个项目的问卷(回复率94%)。本研究描述了在控制项目难度和区分度后的因子分析结果。15个项目具有中等难度和较好至良好的区分度。对这15个项目进行因子分析确定了四个因子。其中三个因子包含来自多个核心功能的项目。这些发现为未来研究提出了一个有趣的问题:公共卫生的核心功能更好地被视为三个离散、可区分的因子,还是视为形成一个单一无缝单元的三个相互关联的因子?