Christenson G M
Public Health Practice Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;11(6 Suppl):45-50.
To illustrate how core function concepts might be useful in evaluation of specific local health department (LHD) programs, we analyzed preliminary results from a national questionnaire survey of LHD occupational safety and health (OSH) activities during 1992-1993 in categories corresponding to the three core functions: assessment, policy development, and assurance. Overall, 2,079 (71%) LHDs returned completed questionnaires. With regard to the first core function (assessment), the state health department was the most frequent source of data used by the respondent LHDs (47%) to assess worker health and occupational hazards. Concerning the second core function category (policy development), 5% of LHDs had conducted an appraisal in the past three years to summarize the OSH needs of their communities. With regard to the third core function category (assurance), 23% of LHDs directly provided worksite health promotion activities for workers in their communities. We conclude that core function concepts can be a useful adjunct in evaluation of specific LHD programs. Additional research is needed to further refine and improve core function indicators providing insights into specific LHD programs, as well as into overall LHD performance.
为了说明核心职能概念在评估特定地方卫生部门(LHD)项目时如何发挥作用,我们分析了1992 - 1993年期间对LHD职业安全与健康(OSH)活动进行的全国问卷调查的初步结果,这些结果按照评估、政策制定和保障这三项核心职能进行分类。总体而言,2079个(71%)LHD返回了完整的问卷。关于第一项核心职能(评估),州卫生部门是被调查的LHD在评估工人健康和职业危害时最常使用的数据来源(47%)。关于第二项核心职能类别(政策制定),5%的LHD在过去三年中进行了评估,以总结其社区的职业安全与健康需求。关于第三项核心职能类别(保障),23%的LHD直接为其社区的工人提供工作场所健康促进活动。我们得出结论,核心职能概念可以作为评估特定LHD项目的有用辅助手段。需要进一步开展研究,以进一步完善和改进核心职能指标,从而深入了解特定LHD项目以及LHD的整体表现。