Jones A M, Doust J H
Chelsea School Research Centre, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Int J Sports Med. 1995 Nov;16(8):541-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973051.
Conconi et al. (1982) reported the development of noninvasive field test for anaerobic threshold (AT) based upon an observed deviation from the linear heart rate (HR)--running velocity (RV) relationship at high RV (HRdev). While the validity of the Conconi test has been debated (Heck and Hollmann 1992; Tokmakidis and Leger 1992), the reliability of the Conconi test has never been independently assessed in athletes performing the protocol outlined by Conconi. This study evaluated the reliability of the Conconi test in 15 well-trained male distance runners (22.5 +/- 3.3 yrs, 67.7 +/- 4.8 kg, VO2 peak 66.4 +/- 4.8 ml.kg-1.min-1) who performed a treadmill simulation of the Conconi test protocol twice within a 4-8 day period. The results were as follows: 6 subjects demonstrated HRdev in both Conconi tests, 5 subjects demonstrated HRdev in only one test, and in 4 subjects HRdev could not be discerned in either test. It was concluded that failure to determine a reproducible HRdev by subjective assessment in 9 of 15 subjects makes the Conconi test unsuitable for reliable evaluation of AT.
孔科尼等人(1982年)报告了一种基于在高跑步速度(RV)时观察到的心率(HR)与跑步速度(RV)之间线性关系的偏差(HRdev)来开发无氧阈(AT)无创现场测试的方法。虽然孔科尼测试的有效性一直存在争议(赫克和霍尔曼,1992年;托马基迪斯和勒热,1992年),但孔科尼测试的可靠性从未在按照孔科尼概述的方案进行测试的运动员中进行过独立评估。本研究评估了15名训练有素的男性长跑运动员(22.5±3.3岁,67.7±4.8千克,最大摄氧量66.4±4.8毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)进行孔科尼测试方案跑步机模拟两次(在4 - 8天内)时孔科尼测试的可靠性。结果如下:6名受试者在两次孔科尼测试中均出现HRdev,5名受试者仅在一次测试中出现HRdev,4名受试者在两次测试中均未出现HRdev。研究得出结论,15名受试者中有9名通过主观评估未能确定可重复的HRdev,这使得孔科尼测试不适用于可靠评估无氧阈。